Talk:This Is America (song)

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This article was accepted from this draft on 7 May 2018 by reviewer Ammarpad (talk · contribs). hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

	Songs
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: Howard, Theresa Ruth (May 10, 2018). "A Dancer's Take on 'This is America': Is The Dance A Distraction Or Something Deeper?". Dance Magazine. Retrieved May 11, 2018.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[List of Billboard Hot 100 chart achievements and milestones#Number-one debuts|debut at number one]] The anchor (#Number-one debuts) has been deleted by other users before. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 January 2020 and 15 March 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kevintowles39.

Above undated message substituted from

In the "Music Video" section, a major portion of it has "We" before every sentence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.240.130.67 (talk) 01:26, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

wrong, there's at least one black person on the left, and due to them being blurred out some of them could be latino or anything other than white, too — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.194.173.74 (talk) 19:06, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

nor Mashable nor HuffPost is not a music magazine. Please use music magazines or something reputable not tabloidy/clickbait internet garbage sources. EDIT also, Rolling Stone is not a music magazine despite its name Yoandri Dominguez Garcia 17:07, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

It's a reliable source at times. See

WP:IRS EvergreenFir (talk) 17:15, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

I am having trouble verify this sentence in the Times article source cited or even understanding the meaning the editor was getting at. In particular, the prase "At one point in time" implies that America no longer has these problems which is clearly not the message of this song/video.

Viewers were angered at the message, seeing it as an insult to Americans that were said to have ignored racial issues that plagued America at one point in time.

Can someone take a look and tell me I am not crazy to remove it? Also, why say "Aside from deserved praise"? Do we not need a reliable source for these "angered viewers"? I have no doubt they exist but we still need a source. ---Coffeeandcrumbs 06:53, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ss112: Re diff, the article already has a short description because by default it uses Wikidata—see d:Q52808665 which is the "Wikidata item" link in the tools on the left of the article. Short descriptions are very helpful for the many readers accessing Wikipedia with a mobile device—readers see the description at the top of the article, and they see it when searching for the title. The problem with leaving the short description at Wikidata is that it could be vandalized there and editors here may never notice. However, if the description is here, any damage will be noticed. That is why short descriptions are being applied to each article at enwiki. The note added in diff seems to be about WP:Hatnote? That note does not apply to {{short description}}. Johnuniq (talk) 09:35, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnuniq: I already know why short descriptions are being added to articles, and no, I meant the note to apply to the description (yes, it's a similar reasoning to not using a hatnote, but that last part is about the specific wording that was used in the description). I don't think this "trend" will last; it'll be like the interwiki language links that were here for a few years at the ends of articles then removed. Ss112 09:45, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is a short description (at Wikidata, click the above link), and sooner or later someone will damage it. Readers will see the damage displayed very prominently, but editors here won't notice. Johnuniq (talk) 09:58, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yet here you are trying to apply your own theories of special relativity to it. It’s chronologically implausible that this song was recorded before even Atlanta was created let alone taking 4 years. I simply used

common sense. Trillfendi (talk) 19:58, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Why is this information included in the article? As the article states, the guitarist is not Trayvon Martin's father. This was just a rumor that was corrected within hours of the video going up--it didn't even last long enough to become an urban legend. More generally, the music video section contains a lot of conjecture and interpretations without citations. Faithfulruslan (talk) 14:35, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]