Talk:Thomas F. Madden
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comment
Please try to avoid words like "recent", as they are too vague (see
WP:VAGUE), and rapidly become out of date. When someone reads the article, they can't tell if that paragraph was written in 2008 or 2004! So it is best to add a specific year. For example, "As of 2008, Madden's newest book is (title)". --Elonka 17:05, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
]
Requested move 11 October 2017
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:55, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
– I do not believe that the current article subject is notable enough to be the clear primary topic over the half dozen other people who share the name and have articles. I note that on his Amazon.com author page, and on his book covers, he is attributed as "Thomas F. Madden". bd2412 T 13:24, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support per nomination. The author's WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 18:06, 11 October 2017 (UTC)]
- Support – this looks like the best way to deal with the ambiguous names. Dicklyon (talk) 03:45, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- Strong support – subject isn't yet notable enough to warrant a titular article name. ToThAc (talk) 15:05, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.