Talk:Tina Ambani

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers. India Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles Women in Business Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"the girl with a past"---nothing on that?

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.248.69.31 (talk) 16:24, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tina_Ambani&diff=562112196&oldid=562072362 My version gives the ref - http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=186&catName=MTk4MA==</ref - proving Karz was a success and http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=187&catName=MTk4MQ== says Katilol Ka Katil was hit. Though Rishi-Tina did 6 films - rest 4 are not even mentioned in the site proving they were not in top 20 and hence other four not successful.

• Whereas in the earlier version not only user NeinN removed these two refs but also claims - Rakesh Roshan repeated Tina in films, such as Aap Ke Deewane (1980) and Aakhir Kyon? (1985) - where the fact is Akhir Kyun was of J.Om Prakash and Rakesh Roshan was only a supporting actir and the film was not produced and directed by Rajesh Roshan. Have the users bonadea and NeinN provided any citation for this claim?
• What I had added - for tat refs are there but for the info you have put is original research and not a fact and so remove it!!!Lionbase1234 (talk) 04:27, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Which source told user bonadea that Aap Ke Deewane or Yeh Wada Raha were successful? Why is there a need to mention the names of film Yeh Wada Raha. The films Karz and Khatilol Ka Katil deserved to find a mention only because they were successful moreover NeilN earlier you had told me in my talk page to show whether these 2 filsm Karz and Katilol Ka Katil were successful - so I have showed that.

Still I have gone ahead and found out refs to prove Aap Ke Deewane was flop - http://www.insidestorymedia.com/life-history-of-bollywood-actor-hrithik-roshan/

and the google book proves http://books.google.co.in/books?id=l3heZ8I-k9AC&pg=PT276&lpg=PT276&dq=Yeh+Vaada+Raha+(1982),+based+on+Danielle+Steel's+novel+The+Promise,+directed+by+Kapil+Kapoor,+wascritically+appreciated+but+commerciallya+flop&source=bl&ots=-7NOEEJ79y&sig=j0lBSEptjXpZxpKfoyEFYceWHYA&hl=en&sa=X&ei=MQ7RUbCKJsSH4gSal4HoDg&ved=0CCsQ6AEwAA says Yeh Vaada Raha (1982), based on Danielle Steel's novel The Promise, directed by Kapil Kapoor, was critically appreciated but commercially a flop.

Another reference http://www.boxofficeindia.com/cpages.php?pageName=top_actors and an interview - http://www.mid-day.com/entertainment/2013/jun/070613-from-action-to-production.htm says Deedar E yaar was a disaster. I have proved my point - that the other 4 were flops.

• I did get a positive reply from the other user NeinN who advised me to raise the issue in talk page of Tina Ambani article.
• Though I expressed my concerns in talk page of bonadea - this user conviniently labelled my version as trivia and unimportant and reverted her/his talk page to earlier version and did not respond back. When talk page discussion mechanism is not trusted then there is no use of any discussion with that user.Lionbase1234 (talk) 17:01, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OR applies to this article just like all others, and the removed information violated that guideline, as shown by the synthesis of sources above. (Please note that the comments above are made by a blocked sockpuppet whose modus operandi with her or his many confirmed sockpuppet accounts is to add original research and minor trivia details to articles; whether by ignorance of the guidelines despite many attempts over many years to educate her or him, or because s/he is aware of the guidelines but chooses to ignore them, is unknown.) --bonadea contributions talk 16:18, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

In addition, and more importantly,

WP:BLP applies to all articles about living people, and adding unsourced or badly sourced gossip about living people really is not acceptable. Ambani and Khanna had a relationship - that is well-sourced. Minor details about their breakup, or possible reasons why she chose not to continue filming, phrased in gossip-magazine terms and with very weak sources indeed, simply are not encyclopedic information or appropriate for Wikipedia. --bonadea contributions talk 16:23, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply

]