Talk:Tourism in Denmark

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Denmark High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Travel and Tourism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I've changed the reference to hygge to one explaining why you're a likely to have it explained to you as a tourist.i love denmark lol

Does this article have a problem with "

I might be a Dane living in Denmark, but this article almost made me sick. The (neutrality) tag seems to be too little for this page! Blech! 130.225.54.2 04:00, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I second what 130.225.54.2 said. "Windmills, antique (pictured) and modern, accent the gently rolling meadowlands of Denmark"? Eww! It would be more appropriate to write what the tourism in Denmark is like. I have no insight in the tourism industry, though; I only know that there are many Germans on Djursland because of the sommerhuse ("light" bungalows). It would be good with some expert help.

I agree that the writer went a bit overboard with his praises of Denmark. :-) Maybe someone should tone it down a bit. -- Boereck 14:16, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I don't know precisely if this is a representative sample of the Danish tourist industry, but it is a fact that the official tourist guide for the island of Møn (perhaps 50 page colour brochure) sells the place on its peace and tranquility, and indeed recommends taking a visit to the local library. The locals in Copenhagen told me not to bother locking the car. So while this does read like platitudes, it may also be NPOV. But yes, it is rather short on details. Sandpiper 15:10, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since Denmark has got a short period as a republic, Sweden surpasses it by many years as the oldest kingdom. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.250.165.156 (talk) 22:48, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? Anyway Japan beats Denmark as the oldest reigning monarchy. Denmark is only the oldest European kingdom. It has diplomatic significance when royalty meets, where some seatings are based the age of the ruling houses. Carewolf (talk) 16:10, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This has gone on too long (see above) and I have now removed the unencyclopedic content. Unfortunately, this meant almost the entire article, except images and some links. I couldn't find anything else in it that should be here. Note that the article should not be deleted, as the subject is notable. I am not an expert here, but we need information such as: Number of tourist, contry of origin, impact on Danish economy, most visited attractions etc... Please help. Zarniwoot 21:58, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article does not go very far in describing all the opportunities for tourism in Denmark. I will try to add some content myself but others should try to contribute too.--Ipigott (talk) 19:58, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dose denmark have a place called Legoland? I need to know —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.207.38.134 (talk) 22:12, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An image used in this article, File:Copenhagen 0887.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Copenhagen 0887.JPG) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- talk) 22:43, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply ]