Talk:Tourism in London

This article was nominated for deletion on 29 January 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

London High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is it just me who thinks this article sounds like it has been written by a ten year old, also in many parts it reads as an advertisement. Stevvvv4444 (talk) 17:39, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah this is simply an advertisement —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.184.129.92 (talk) 23:05, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't an article this is just a guide for tourists. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.131.56.108 (talk) 23:12, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Appalling. It needs rewriting. Ericoides (talk) 17:19, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

London International tourism requires a revision since Paris now leads by 2 million annual tourists. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tourism_in_Paris

Paris is the third most visited city in the world after Orlando[3] and New York City,[4] and the first by international visitors (with about 17 million in city proper).

Thank you from solarsail. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.92.115.223 (talk) 22:38, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Tourism in London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130228094422/http://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/wp53.pdf to http://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/wp53.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130228094422/http://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/wp53.pdf to http://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/wp53.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:59, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]