Talk:Trace amine-associated receptor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconNeuroscience High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPharmacology Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMedicine Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

'

New review

It's probably worth using this review to add new content to

3-iodothyronamine, trace amine, TAAR1, TAAR2, TAAR5, TAAR6, TAAR8, and this article. Seppi333 (Insert 2¢) 02:28, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

References

  1. PMID 27424325
    .

Human trace amine-associated receptors

@Boghog: do you think the content within and layout of this table is suitable for covering these receptors in the article?

Also, do you think it's reasonable to just list "known/putative functions" and "known ligands" as well as explicitly state "other G protein coupling unknown" for these receptors when so few things are actually known about hTAAR2-hTAAR9? Seppi333 (Insert 2¢) 22:30, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

E.g., this review[1] lists "CNS and periphery unknown" under the associated putative functions column in table 1 for all of these receptors, except for TAAR1. Off-topic: I emailed Dr. Berry and he was kind enough to multi-license figure 2 from this review so that I could upload it to Commons and use it in TAAR1. Seppi333 (Insert 2¢) 22:36, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Seppi333. The lack knowledge about what these receptor subtypes do is of course a direct consequence of a lack of selective ligands to probe their function. The way you have presented this in the table I think is fine. The only suggestion I have is to make clear which of the functions are known and which are putative. Also I found the pink color for pseudogenes distracting and unnecessary. It is clear enough from the text that these are pseudogenes. Boghog (talk) 05:03, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good. Removing the coloring is fine with me. Thanks for the feedback! Seppi333 (Insert 2¢) 05:20, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. PMID 28723415
    .
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Trace_amine-associated_receptor&oldid=1206155848"