Talk:Trams in Kolkata
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Trams in Kolkata article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 9 August 2015
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved to Trams in Kolkata. Jenks24 (talk) 15:30, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Kolkata metro which is just a redirect from a title with another method of capitalisation. For this reason, I believe moving this page into Kolkata Tram to capitalize it is necessary. Broman178 (talk) 14:02, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
]
- I'm going to Oppose this proposal until some kind of sourcing is provided that shows that this system should be described using a "proper name". In the absence of that, Kharkiv tram, etc.).]
(Sidenote: The modern tram systems' article naming schemes are currently a mess, and this "[City] tram" vs. "[City] Tram" issue is just one of several examples – these tram articles are in desperate need of some article naming "standardization", and I've already tried to do what I can on my end (and will likely have to do more in the future)...) --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:34, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hold up!! This system has existed since the 1800's? And it has been in continuous operation the whole time? – In that case, definitely oppose the current proposal, but support moving article to Trams in Kolkata! I and another editor (User:Bahnfrend) have been trying to set "Trams in [city]" as the "standardized" naming scheme for either, 1) long-operational tram systems (e.g. those in continuous operation since the early 1900s, or earlier), or 2) historical city tram systems that operated in the early 20th century until c.1950s–60s), for quite some time (with some success). So Trams in Kolkata is the best possible title here. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:00, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- Rename to Trams in Kolkata unless it can be conclusively established that the network is called Kolkata Tram, which doesn't seem to be the case. Definitely the best title for these articles. Kolkata Metro is its actual name - that's why it's capitalised. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:45, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:49, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Kalighat Tram Depot
I don't think kalighat is running anymore so it should be changed. Vijay6767 (talk) 04:28, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Do you have a source? Rasnaboy (talk) 04:42, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Source: https://www.facebook.com/325579620923526/posts/pfbid02WMTxkUgiwW219c5B9ntz7uEhAyqWWrLVqjXgejQjLmLtjXUbW4NcuotWdYQJ1a7ol/?app=fbl — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vijay6767 (talk • contribs) 05:06, 12 February 2023 (UTC)