Talk:Tupolev Tu-80

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Good articleTupolev Tu-80 has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 2, 2011Good article nomineeListed
Did You KnowA fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 20, 2009.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Aviation / Russian & Soviet / Cold War
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Military aviation task force
Taskforce icon
Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
Taskforce icon
Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

GA Review

This review is
transcluded from Talk:Tupolev Tu-80/GA1
. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Thurgate (talk) 00:19, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

here
for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    prose: (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the
    neutral point of view
    policy
    .
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have
    suitable captions
    )
    :
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Comments

1. and adding fuel capacity. Suggest - and a higher fuel capacity.

2. and a top speed of 620 km/h (390 mph). Suggest - and have a top speed of 620 km/h (390 mph).

  • I've reworded both, see how you like them now. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:18, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 00:19, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work Strum. Passed. Thurgate (talk) 00:41, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bleed air deicers

"Bleed air" is a terminology used by jet or turbine-powered aircraft that use some of the compressed air from their own compressors for various purposes. Among those is the "bleed air deicer". I'm not clear on how a piston-engine aircraft can even have bleed air to power deicers, as stated in the article. Perhaps it has oversized turbochargers and it's bled off from that? The only other thing I can think of is that it has an air compressor specifically to compress air to deice the wings. If it's the former, it would be nice to have it explained, if it's the second, it's not technically bleed air, and therefore not technically a bleed air deicer. One could say "it used air to deice the wings, similar to a bleed air deicer", but it is not a bleed air deicer if it's not a turbine-powered aircraft. — Preceding unsigned comment added by .45Colt (talkcontribs) 14:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]