Talk:Typhoon Chataan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Good topic candidate
Promoted
Current status: Featured article

Todo

More intro and impact. Jdorje 19:42, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chataan's PAGASA Name of Gloria

I noticed on the Typhoon 2000 site that the name Chataan had while in the PAGASA region, Gloria, was replaced by Glenda and that a small note at the bottom confirmed this. Was the name Gloria officially retired and should the name change be noted in the article? Here's the source for the name change: http://www.typhoon2000.ph/names.htm Jake52 My talk 04:40, 27 June 2006 (EST)

Absolutely, the PAGASA listing shows Glenda as the current name.--Nilfanion (talk) 10:59, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Links

Hurricanehink (talk) 15:00, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Links to damage reports and locations

  • [1] Ward Prefecture: 9.2 billion yen
  • [2] Oshima in Hokkaido: 153 million yen
  • [3] Aomori Prefecture: ~140 billion yen

Added some of the sources, more when I have time. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 14:18, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Damage estimates

Given the doubt that has arisen with regard to the recent additions of extreme damage estimates, I've reverted the past few edits to this article as a temporarily solution. We need at least one more reliable English source to confirm that this is one of the costliest storms in the world. –Juliancolton | Talk 01:15, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is
transcluded from Talk:Typhoon Chataan/GA1
. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 17:52, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

review
  • The article is very thorough and clear, considering the complexity of the subject. I have one suggestion.
  • in the lede you mention PAGASA and don't mention it again until the end. A first mention should include
    Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration
    (PAGASA). Is there a way you could include this?
  • Well, the first mentions are in the first sentence. I don't wanna have too much there, but I don't want it to be confusing. Do you have any suggestions? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 14:37, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • No, but I was very confused by it. Had to do a find and located it in the lede and then click on the link. Perhaps if you don't mention PAGASA again it would be ok. The first mention at least has a link, so no search and find is necessary. The article is fairly complicated to follow and I found myself hunting back a fair number of times, but none only mentioned in the lede and the last sentence. I won't fail on this account as I don't see this as part of the GA criteria. MathewTownsend (talk) 14:53, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've made a few changes for the sake of prose that you're free to revert.[4]. Put on hold awaiting response, but that's the only concern I have.

MathewTownsend (talk) 14:35, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sorry, I didn't see that sentence at the bottom of the lede. Don't know how I missed that with "Find"! It's fine. MathewTownsend (talk) 15:05, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

here
for what they are not)

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose:
    copyright laws
    , correct spelling and grammar:
    B. Complies with
    list incorporation
    :
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Provides references to all sources:
    B. Provides
    reliable sources
    where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Main aspects are addressed:
    B. Remains focused:
  4. Does it follow the
    neutral point of view
    policy
    .
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
    fair use rationales
    :
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
    suitable captions
    :
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Pass!

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Typhoon Chataan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:57, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Typhoon Chataan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:22, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]