Talk:U.S. Route 395 in Nevada

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

State nav

For the state nav box at the bottom of the article, do we really need two links that link to California? Can't we link the previous state to California and the next state to Oregon? ^_^ AL2TB ^_^ 00:13, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since it doesn't go from Nevada to Oregon, Oregon is incorrect. --NE2 00:28, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well neither does U.S. Route 395 in California uses a previous state of nevada; US 395's southern terminus is in Hesperia. ^_^ AL2TB ^_^ 00:33, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
See my comment on
talk) —Preceding comment was added at 00:36, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
Okay, I understand, but what does IMO stand for? ^_^ AL2TB ^_^ 01:19, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, IMO = In My Opinion. In reference to what I said on the California article NE was a reference to

talk) 01:48, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Field mileposts

Since Nevada DOT doesn't post complete milepost logs, here are some mileposts observed in the field in/near Carson City. (* = MPs adjusted to new/proposed bypass mileage that does not currently correspond with the milepost book.)

  • 0.56 - US 50 West
  • 6.73 - College Pkwy intg*
  • 8.03 - Arrowhead Dr intg*
  • 8.46 - N. Carson St intg*
  • 9.78 - CC/WA co line*
  • 2.74 - Bellvue Rd

--LJ (talk) 20:24, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone mention future I-580's construction in the article?

Allen (talk) 21:28, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's certainly on my "to do" list--but this is not near the top, and it's a long list. My current focus has been in other areas, though... -- LJ  17:10, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

History section

An anon contributed a detailed and convoluted History section. I haven't checked any of this unsourced stuff for accuracy, but I did format it, add capital letters and periods at what I took to be ends of sentences, and such, so at least it sort of reads like English. Needs work. Dicklyon (talk) 03:54, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's been reverted as duplicative. There might have been some useful things in there, if sources could be found. Dicklyon (talk) 15:14, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your efforts, but I reverted the whole addition by the IP. It was a mess. Much of it was duplicative with Interstate 580 (Nevada), or irrelevant to this article, or speculation; and it wasn't comprehensive for the whole route. -- LJ  15:15, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]