Talk:USL W-League (1995–2015)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Women's sport: WOSO Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Women's football / soccer task force. Football: American & Canadian / Women's football Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the American and Canadian soccer task force (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by the women's football task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

On 9 December 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from USL W-League to USL W-League (1995–2015). The result of the discussion was moved.

The New Hampshire Lady Phantoms article was blanked on 2024-03-25 and that title now redirects to USL W-League (1995–2015). The contents of the former article are available in the redirect's history; for the discussion at that location, see the redirect's talk page .

The Mile High Edge link should go somewhere besides back to this page (under redundant, see redundant) --Paploo (talk) 03:33, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi US women's football followers,

The new Australian women's league has just been announced and it is also called the W-League. I have called the new article

Suggestions:

• W-League (Australia)
• W-League (Australia)
• W-League (Australia)
• USL W-League / Australian W-League
• USL W-League / W-League (not implying the Aus one has "priority" - just that if the US one is known as the USL W-League there is no disambiguation needed)

Comments?

-- Chuq (talk) 02:42, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think for right now we should stick with

W-League (Australia). Right now there are more pages for the American W-League (and eventually I'll have more for past seasons), so I think the current configuration would require the least amount of change. This is a pretty bare-bones staff working on the W-League (primarily myself and JonBroxton), so at least I'd rather keep it as is for now. If it's decided to change this, I don't have any qualms with the decision, it might just take a little bit to get all of the pages and templates changed depending on other circumstances. Mtndrums (talk) 03:33, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Not sure if I am going blind but wasn't there previously an italicised disambiguation sentence at the top of this article eg. 'This is about the North American League for the Australian League see W-League (Australia)' ? If there was any reason why this was removed? If not, any problems if I add such a sentence? --TinTin (talk) 10:55, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Midwest Division

• Buffalo Flash  NY
  (2009-)
• Chicago Red Eleven  IL (2009-, Chicago Gaels 2005-08, Chicago Cobras 1996-2004)
• Cleveland Internationals Women  OH (2004-)
• Kalamazoo Outrage  MI (2008-)

• West Michigan Firewomen  MI (2004-) this team is not on the official list.

• London Gryphons This is what shows up on the W-league website [1]. Should I change it? --Ceezmad (talk) 19:44, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Someone recently tried to sort all the teams by region, then by state. I reverted this since the regions used were never represented as such in the W-League conference alignments, but it got me thinking if there might be a better was to list all historical W-League teams in some way better than the alphabetical list shown. Would people be opposed to replacing the alphabetical list (or at least putting it under a hide/show box) in favor of a timeline like this or similar? CyMoahk2 (talk) 17:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since the United Soccer League announced the creation of a new version of the USL W-League on 6/9/2021, I propose that this article be renamed "USL W-League (1995-2015)" and a new article be created for the new version. GrouchoPython (talk) 16:28, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GrouchoPython: Technically, the new league is called "USL W League" (no dash), so we could just leave this article where it is and create a new article under that title. I definitely agree we need a new article though -- this article seems very confusing right now trying to cover both the old league and the new one. --IagoQnsi (talk) 19:06, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone ahead and created a new article: USL W League --IagoQnsi (talk) 19:31, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]