This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Definite stub or written by someone who works there. Way too slick and positive. Boils (talk) 00:45, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. The problem is that the material is just a copy of an article written and published by the organisation itself. Essentially, it is an organisational autobiography. That the material is public domain means that we can use it verbatim, but doesn't mean we must. -- Whpq (talk) 18:57, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Way too slick and positive? That's silly. It just lists what they do, their responsibilities, and some facts about the history and the organization. I'm not saying more can't be added, but what's here is pretty neutral and a pretty good starting point. How is stating the year they were founded or who the current commander is not neutral? Take the tag off and, if you want to add more, all the Army Regs are availble online. Start reading. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.11.111.44 (talk) 18:40, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
