Talk:United States Army Special Forces selection and training

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: North America / United States This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  North American military history task force United States military history task force

Why is there a photo of 10th group soldiers in an article about the Q course? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.20.111.117 (talk) 00:18, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Q course is only a portion of the article as it is only a portion of the training Army SF undergoes. Also covered in the article is SFAS, post Q course advanced training, and training conducted by individual Groups. The picture in question shows 10th Group soldiers conducting in Group training at their shoot house on Carson. TomPointTwo (talk) 08:07, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm will be training with the army 2018. I have interest in the special forces being recruited by the Marines out of Highschool K-9 USA (talk) 03:10, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I want to train to be the greatest that I can be to serve as a soldier in the army. I am so proud of my grandfather served as a Navy Seal and my other grandfather who served as a soldier in the Army. Now I have the same chance to serve as a soldier in the United States Army and I will never forget that Sacrifice that comes with the Responsibility that comes with the duty of an soldier K-9 USA (talk) 03:19, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reading pages where acronyms are defined only once, and in text, is difficult for those not familiar with the subject. Two ideas to clarify this problem.

1. Change all acronyms to actual terms. (not recommended)
2. Add a section to acronym heavy articles. This section would act as a sort of appendix or glossary that would prevent the reader's need to scroll through the entire article looking for the one sentence that defines the acronym. It could also be set up to work with a template. Users add <acro name=foo> </acro> in the edit, and the tag {{acrolist}} near the bottom.

I think this is a pretty swell idea.

If you really wanted to build an acronym template I supposed it would be worth giving it a shot. Still, most acronyms should be defined or linked out to a parent article periodically in a lengthy article. You should also note that your browser will probably have a search function which is more often than not accessed using "ctrl+f". This can help you quickly find the oroginal (and so defined) instance of a word or acronym appearing on a page. TomPointTwo (talk) 06:47, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why did we change these to "his or her" a bunch of times and not just use "their" — Preceding unsigned comment added by KM4JWL (talk • contribs) 01:58, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So, like two years ago I edited a bunch of "Robin Sage" to ROBIN SAGE, but don't remember why, and can't seem to find any official references to it as an acronym or in all-caps, is it supposed to be like this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by KM4JWL (talk • contribs) 02:03, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]