Talk:Victoria Memorial, London

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Categories?

Resolved

Should we add the article to the category Lions in art? The prose mentions lions, but I question if the connection is apparent enough. Personally, I prefer to include in as many relevant categories as possible, but I do think it would take require someone accessing the article via the Lions category to read the fine print to see why it is included. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:22, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto "Allegorical sculptures" category. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:26, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've added both categories, but also included a picture of one of the bronze groups to make the relevance of the categories clearer. Ham II (talk) 09:42, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:50, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Table for sculptures?

Thoughts on having a table (much like the public art lists) containing entries for individual sculptures such as Winged Victory, Truth, Justice etc.? Perhaps the entries already appear on one of the public art lists, so we shouldn't re-create the wheel. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:55, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. I had thought about doing myself and had been looking for images. I think there are freely available ones for every sculpture. Would also support if it was done via a gallery with comments below each. JMiall 19:45, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sounds good to me! List of public art in the City of Westminster doesn't list the sculptures individually; it does for the Albert Memorial, but that was the work of multiple sculptors whereas the Victoria Memorial is all by Thomas Brock. Ham II (talk) 11:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Victoria Memorial, London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—

Talk to my owner:Online 13:36, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply
]