Talk:Village of the Angels

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Doctor Who Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance). BBC Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Tasks for WikiProject BBC: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments) Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles Other : *Restructure the category Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible Add references to assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments) Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Have been attempting to add the information "Vincent Brimble also previously appeared in the serial Warriors of the Deep." but have been having trouble with citations.

Here is a list of citations that could be used: https://cultbox.co.uk/news/doctor-who-flux-village-of-the-angels-full-cast-list https://anglotopia.net/british-entertainment/brit-tv/bbc/doctor-whooligan-village-of-the-angels-galaxy-4-big-finish-new-the-vanquishers/ https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussion/2419393/doctor-who-s13-e4-village-of-the-angels-bbc1-sunday-21st-november-2021-6-20pm-official-thread https://tardis.fandom.com/wiki/Vincent_Brimble https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0562983/2603:6010:D02:B200:A9B5:6A43:40A8:D5F9 (talk) 20:46, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see that we are including information about the RottenTomatoes aggregate critical score from professional critics. My understanding is that RottenTomatoes also sometimes creates an aggregated audience score (that is, non-critics). Could this be added to this article, please? Or, if the BBC or RottenTomatoes has not permitted this to be created, could a note about this be added to the article? It's pretty clear that if the BBC has intervened to prevent such a score from being published, this is in and of itself notable. Thanks. RomanSpa (talk) 22:33, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per

WP:USERG, Although review aggregators (such as Rotten Tomatoes) may be reliable when summarizing experts; otherwise, their ratings based on the opinions of their users are not. DonQuixote (talk) 00:42, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply

]