Talk:Virus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Featured articleVirus is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 5, 2009.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 20, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
July 14, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
October 19, 2006Good article nomineeListed
November 4, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
February 6, 2008Good article reassessmentKept
September 23, 2008Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article
Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Top-importance).
WikiProject iconBiology Top‑importance
WikiProject iconVirus is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMedicine High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
tree of life on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Minor edit request: "divided up into"->"divided into"

  • Specific text to be added or removed: Among RNA viruses and certain DNA viruses, the genome is often divided up into separate parts, in which case it is called segmented.
  • Reason for the change: Poor writing style
  • References supporting change: n/a

Thanks, 73.68.184.188 (talk) 16:50, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

minor edit request under "novel viruses"

"The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus that caused the pandemic of covid disease is an example of a novel virus." to "The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus that caused the COVID-19 pandemic [...]" for proper capitalisation and sounding more natural than "covid disease". thank you for filling this out if you do -- 2403:5807:7862:0:914E:BAA5:1B08:7F81 (talk) 12:50, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestion which I have incorporated. - Graham Beards (talk) 13:08, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Submicroscopic

i want know that what is submicroscopic 106.205.32.249 (talk) 06:31, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Too small to be seen with an optical microscope. Graham Beards (talk) 06:32, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested addition to the article

"In addition, some microorganisms are grazing directly on viruses, which can make up a significant amount of their nutrition. Also larger organisms like appendicularians and sponges can feed on viruses, but only make up a small part of their diet."[1] Hipporoo (talk) 05:45, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

Mention of viruses as obligate parasites?

Just read a paper on the topic, and wondered if it would fit here. I try not to make content changes on larger pages without consulting the talk page first. FullyNatural (talk) 20:07, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is pretty much covered in the first sentence. Viruses aren't traditionally thought of as parasites as they are dependent on the host (cell) for much more than just nutrients. What was the paper? Graham Beards (talk) 10:14, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Here's the DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1016%2FB978-012373944-5.00323-0
You're right in saying viruses aren't typically thought of as viruses. FullyNatural (talk) 13:35, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That might be the stupidest thing I've ever written. Of course I mean "parasites" not "viruses"... FullyNatural (talk) 13:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That 2009 article looks like it was based on an earlier version of our article [1] and is not a good source. I don't think it would help our readers to add "obligate intracellular parasites" - it confuses more than it informs. Graham Beards (talk) 13:48, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fair point, thanks for the insight! FullyNatural (talk) 19:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]