Talk:WSJV

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Indiana Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (assessed as Mid-importance). Television: Stations This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Television stations task force.

So I know I am just a random user (no username), but I check these pages often as I live in the South Bend area. It has been a bit of a frustration to see subchannels added to these pages that do not actually exist on the broadcast. They are all tagged with "(Soon)" as if to indicate that they are coming to the station soon but none of them cite a source to credit that as truth and some of the edits have been there for months. This page, WSJV, seems to be the worst culprit. But WNIT also seems to have become a victim as well. I'm not one to name names, but looking at the edit history it all seems to have been added by the same user. Are subchannels exempt from needing a source cited? Because I would think they should be just as accurate as the rest of the article.

I wasn't sure where to bring this up, but figured the Talk page was probably an OK place to do it. If it is not then an Admin may feel free to delete this. 167.239.221.102 (talk) 14:44, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]