Talk:Waddy Wachtel

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Record Production

	Record Production articles. Questions or comments related to record production and related articles are welcome at the project's talk page. Anyone interested may join the project: add your name to the list of project members!Record ProductionWikipedia:WikiProject Record ProductionTemplate:WikiProject Record ProductionRecord Production articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

project-independent quality rating

in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Comment

I was hoping to find some facts regarding Waddy's arrest on charges of possession of child porn (see here), especially whether he was found guilty or exhonerated.

Is it Watchel or Wachtel?

There is a similar article at

Waddy Watchel. If you know which spelling is correct, please merge the articles and create a redirect. --Jonathan O'Donnell 05:24, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Done Cavie78 23:22, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Wachtel

Does anyone know if these two people are related? They seem to intersect in various LA bands of the 70s.

Fantailfan 12:32, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

There is no Richard Wachtel - any reference to a Richard Wachtel in music databases is a misprint of his real name Waddell. This info comes directly from Waddy. I'm in the process of making corrections to the erroneous use of the name Richard. (71.106.11.250 (talk) 16:43, 15 December 2007 (UTC))[reply]

False Sources and Unsourced Material

I just removed the unsubstantiated claim about his being "acquitted" of kiddie porn charges. The source was once false, then there was no source. The only way to be acquitted is with a trial, and a trial would have gotten far more press coverage than the arrest. There is no mention of a trial anywhere on the internet, while some reliable media outlets reported the arrest. This page says he got probation:

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/search/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1801138

I don't know if that is true, but you don't get "acquitted" at trial, then sentenced to probation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.235.244.140 (talk) 14:04, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a reference to his receiving three years probation after pleading no contest to the charges. The link is to the free part of the LA Times archive. Google cache [1] confirms this link as well as reveals Wachtel was ordered to donate $2,500 to Children of the Night, and to undergo 6 months counseling from a psychologist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.152.31.119 (talk) 12:01, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hacking Continues to Censor this Page

It is almost comical how many times Wachtel or agents of Wachtel have hacked this page to conceal or alter information about the arrest on charges of possessing child pornography. There have been totally false claims of his being "acquitted", there have been phony references posted to bolster that lie, and the whole topic was deleted. I don't know how many times this has happened. It isn't just hacking and false postings on Wiki, either. Various websites that carry posts from anyone who cares to make them, regardless of the veracity of the statements, variously claim that he was "acquitted", "exonerated", or that the charges were "dismissed", but there is no reliable evidence of that on this page or anywhere else on the internet. This is dishonest and a disservice to the Wiki community, and just another deceitful act done to cover up another deceitful act. The next time this page is hacked to sweep this unpleasant topic under the carpet, the hacker will be in for a little surprise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.235.228.39 (talk) 09:34, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Response: I don't know who you are or why you're trying so hard to keep information on the Waddy Wachtel page that has nothing to do with his music. I'm not a hacker. It seems like maybe you're the hacker. If the only thing you believe is what you read on the internet, then you're bound to get a lot of wrong or unverifiable information. Even on wiki there are many inconsistencies, not to mention articles all over the internet that are erroneous. If you'd like to discuss this further, maybe we could get someone in a position of authority here to mediate? Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.106.45.57 (talk) 06:38, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia - it is not here purely to say positive things about people or only talk about one particular aspect of someone's life (although in the case of Wachtel it is quite right that the majority of the article is about his music). As someone in the public eye any transgressions are likely to be reported whether he/you like it or not and this needs to be covered by Wiki without condoning a particular point of view, as is done here. I'm sure British footballer Ashley Cole, or TV presenter Johnny Vaughan would prefer that scandals relating to them were not present on their pages but they are part of their lives and need to be talked about in any article that purports to offer even a vaguely comprehensive overview. Cavie78 (talk) 11:12, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm new to this discussion, but can add that http://articles.latimes.com/1998/oct/16/local/me-33017 reports Mr. Wachtel pleaded no contest to possession of child pornography and was placed on three years' probation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.8.135.113 (talk) 04:41, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Waddy Wachtel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080629225853/http://music.yahoo.com/read/news/12034691 to http://music.yahoo.com/read/news/12034691

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:50, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tidy Up Section

Tidy on section may be required on Filmography and References by a competent wikipedian editor — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.147.130.151 (talk) 22:31, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]