Talk:Walkover

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

/Against/ - Walkover has a particular meaning to sports, while acclamation is specific to politics. Eb3686 10:07, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Untitled

Agreed - the sporting sense of the word is distinctively different. If a horse wins a one-horse race at
election will be a walkover for neither. The two distinct articles should remain separate. Guy (talk) 12:40, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Should Urho Kekkonen be added to the article?

Should Urho Kekkonen and/or his two "special" elections be mentioned in the article. Specifically, once "UKK" was elected by "virtue" of an emegergency law, without a proper election, and another time with the support of nine parties, making it a doddle. -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. (talk) 10:54, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is the "walk-over" origin (jockey club horse race) maybe backward construct?

I suspect the word "walk-over" origin is back-constructed? I suspect the word origin really comes from "Game Over" but instead "Walk Over" because the opponent walked away (gave up), eg leaved the match, before it was finished. Because the term is very often used in contest 1vs1, where the opponent gives up by leaving or does not become present to the match in time. (and has then given up)

Its pretty common that words get a backconstruct when its origin is not widely known. Maybe someone could shed some light on this and find other sources on this than the oxford dictionary?

Sebastiannielsen (talk) 02:33, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]