Talk:Wandsworth Bridge

	Wandsworth Bridge is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
	This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 16, 2016.
Article milestones Date Process Result May 7, 2009 Good article nominee Listed August 25, 2010 Featured article candidate Promoted
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 8, 2009. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Wandsworth Bridge has been described as "probably the least noteworthy bridge in London"?
Current status: Featured article

This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

London Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. London Transport Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Transport in London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.London TransportWikipedia:WikiProject London TransportTemplate:WikiProject London TransportLondon Transport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. inactive .River ThamesWikipedia:WikiProject River ThamesTemplate:WikiProject River ThamesRiver Thames articles

Highways: United Kingdom Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the United Kingdom Roads Task Force.

This bridge seems pretty noteworthy considering that of all the bridges in London, it's the least noteworthy. 216.165.132.250 (talk) 17:11, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

While it's a claim that's been quite widely repeated – and hence included in the article – it's not one I agree with in the least. Even among the big Thames bridges, there are many more that I'd consider less noteworthy both architecturally and in terms of their impact on the areas they serve (

iridescent 17:27, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

This claim is surely a victim of the Interesting number paradox?

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Wandsworth Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140305232657/http://www.pla.co.uk/assets/120529_Thames_Byelaws1.pdf to http://www.pla.co.uk/assets/120529_Thames_Byelaws1.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:58, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]