Talk:Wilfred Cantwell Smith

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group. Christianity Top‑importance Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Religion Top‑importance Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

"The Meaning and End of Religion remains Smith's most influential work. The writer who, in turn, has taken up and applied most vigorously Smith's emphases is the former nun Karen Armstrong." I don't know of anyone who would relate the two. There are others talking about the definitions of religion (J. Z. Smith, Tomoko Masuzawa, etc.) but Karen Armstrong doesn't really feature in to academic debate at all. Karen Armstrong has more in common with the scholar of religion HUSTON Smith than WILFRED CANTWELL Smith, so perhaps there's a confusion there? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.184.197.209 (talk) 15:22, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No confusion, I suggest. Armstrong acknowledges her debt to Smith in her autobiographical volume The Spiral Staircase. As Smith advised, she rarely uses the term religion, preferring instead religious tradition or faith. As for her influence and vigor, I would refer you to the article on Karen Armstrong. Wingspeed (talk) 20:17, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070218130850/http://www.lib.umich.edu:80/area/Near.East/sferah.htm to http://www.lib.umich.edu/area/Near.East/sferah.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

which was added only recently. I can see that Asad does say this. But I have looked through a dozen reviews of the book which make no mention of this concept. Neither is it clear what is meant by an "essentialist definition" of religion. So, I gather that it is Asad's own interpretation of the work. This should not be used in the lead description of the work. So, I am deleting it. Please free to add a passage or section on Asad's interpretation if necessary, where the meaning of "essentialist definition" should be explained. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 22:50, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]