Talk:YouNotUs

This article must adhere to the project's importance scale
.

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 31 October 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 15:47, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Younotus → YouNotUs – This group's name appears with different capitalization all over the place, with Younotus, YOUNOTUS, and YouNotUs all appearing in media sources. But in official sources operated by themselves or their record companies, the spelling is YouNotUs. If that is their true name then perhaps it should be the title of the article, but instead of a simple page move I am inviting discussion on which spelling is actually the most recognizable for these guys. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:41, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Weak support: Aside from the remarks by the nominator, it's more readable that way, and mixed case for a string of concatenated words is probably more common in English than the current form. —BarrelProof (talk) 15:36, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support. If third-party sources are inconsistant then it makes sense to use the official capitalisation, if only for the sake of readability. PC78 (talk) 12:38, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
talk page or in a move review
. No further edits should be made to this section.