Template:Did you know nominations/Bigface

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Template:Did you know nominations
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by Theleekycauldron (talk) 07:12, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Bigface

Created by Soulbust (talk). Self-nominated at 03:56, 10 June 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Bigface; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

@Evrik: I replied to HighKing on the talk page of the article. Genuinely wouldn't know how to solve the tagging, as imo the article already meets GNG. But I'll see what I can do. Soulbust (talk) 03:02, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Please look at the close paraphrasing flagged by earwig --evrik (talk) 22:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

@Evrik: Think I addressed the earwig concern but lmk if more needs to be done. Soulbust (talk) 04:07, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Earwig flagged a quote, the rest looks fine. --evrik (talk) 04:14, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

D5 (AfD hold). @Soulbust, Evrik, and Vaticidalprophet: Pinging you just to let you know the status and why. - Aoidh (talk
) 13:19, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

  • The AFD has been closed as no consensus so the review can continue. With that said, the original reviewer has not edited in several weeks so a new one may need to take over. Courtesy ping to Aoidh who was the most recent commenter as well as to the nominator Soulbust. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 09:51, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
    Saw this on the way home and was gonna reply with something like "oh cool!", but lol nevermind I guess :\ Soulbust (talk) 03:11, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
    @Narutolovehinata5: there doesn't seem to be any outstanding issues, so tick per evrik's previous review. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 23:30, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
    @
    HighKing, so I can't promote this. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk
    ) 23:46, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
    okay, marking for further work. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 02:52, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
    Yeah I'd like to just withdraw the nom. The first "relies excessively on references to primary sources" is pretty questionable. Lots of secondary sources present. Second one is just an extension of the disagreeing I'd have with HighKing from the AfD. I'm unsure how to patch the tag in question to alleviate the concern quickly enough for this to be promoted to the DYK section in a timely fashion. Just don't care to deal with this being dragged out even longer. It's been 9+ weeks of this getting held up in one way or another. Sorry just don't have the time for it really. Soulbust (talk) 00:55, 11 September 2023 (UTC)