Template:Did you know nominations/Captain Marvel (film)
<
Template:Did you know nominations
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:50, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Captain Marvel (film)
- ... that Captain Marvel is expected to be Marvel Studios' first female-led film? Source: "Marvel has confirmed that Captain Marvel will be the studio's first female-led superhero movie." [1]
- ALT1: ... that Brie Larson met with active duty airmen at Nellis Air Force Base to prepare for her role as Carol Danvers in Captain Marvel?" Source: "Brie Larson researches Captain Marvel role at Air Force base" [2]
Moved to mainspace by TriiipleThreat (talk) and Favre1fan93 (talk). Nominated by TriiipleThreat (talk) at 14:30, 23 February 2018 (UTC).
- I've added an ALT1 hook for consideration by the reviewer. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:33, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
chat} 18:46, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
- @Howcheng: QPQ is completed unless I am missing something.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:56, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- My bad, my eyes seemed to have completely missed that. —chat} 18:58, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks!--TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:59, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks Howcheng. Nothing against Triiiple's original hook, but I feel the ALT I suggested is "hookier" and might get more interest/eyes to the article. Just my 2¢ as I know you said you preferred the original as well. All good either way. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:12, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- I prefer the original because it presents a groundbreaking aspect of the film. The second one is basically "actor does research for role", which is something not at all unexpected. —chat} 00:59, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Thanks again for the review! - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:58, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
- I prefer the original because it presents a groundbreaking aspect of the film. The second one is basically "actor does research for role", which is something not at all unexpected. —
- Thanks Howcheng. Nothing against Triiiple's original hook, but I feel the ALT I suggested is "hookier" and might get more interest/eyes to the article. Just my 2¢ as I know you said you preferred the original as well. All good either way. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:12, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks!--TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:59, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- My bad, my eyes seemed to have completely missed that. —