Template:Did you know nominations/Nanni di Bartolo

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Template:Did you know nominations
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BorgQueen (talk) 17:52, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Nanni di Bartolo

Created by Johnbod (talk). Self-nominated at 21:18, 19 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Nanni di Bartolo; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

  • Brand new and comprehensive; neutral; perfectly cited. Neither Earwig nor I see any close paraphrasing. Given the coverage, I am surprised that we did not have this article before. I have a couple of nitpicks. Wikipedia should probably not, in its own voice, judge which of the subject's work is "the most striking"; it would probably be better to state that this is according to Seymour and/or Olsen. A much pettier nitpick would be that the expressions "not to mention" and "something of the effect of" seem just a bit too casual, but the latter at least might be reasonably common in art history topics. Most crucially, however, the nomination is missing a QPD review. Surtsicna (talk) 20:24, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
    • Thanks! QPQ done. It's no so surprising we had no article - Italian Renaissance sculpture was brand new last year, & most 2nd division IR Sculptors we do have are EB 1911 with a dash of milk. Even Donatello, which I'm rewriting for the Core contest, was mostly EB 1911. Johnbod (talk) 01:44, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
      • Incredible. Thank you for taking this on. Surtsicna (talk) 19:39, 21 April 2023 (UTC)