Template:Did you know nominations/Pam Taylor
<
Template:Did you know nominations
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by AirshipJungleman29 talk 01:23, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Pam Taylor
"The Unknown Airman", Plymouth Hoe
- ... that ISBN 9781000160529.
Created by AtticTapestry (talk). Nominated by Bogger (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 24 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Bogger (talk) 10:39, 4 April 2024 (UTC).
@Bogger and AtticTapestry: Needs more RS, the article has passing mentions and blog type sites as RS and they discuss the work not the person. Three sentences of the article are related to the person and they are supported with what looks like non-rs. I could not find much either...
- Here is a source
- Another source
- Another source
- These are only passing mentions which are more about the works not the person. I wonder if this article should be redirected to the artwork with the three sentences merged. Bruxton (talk) 21:39, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Two QPQs are done, Earwig is 15% the hook is not very interesting but it is confirmed and in the article. Article is neutral and uses the correct inline citations. The UK has FOP for 3D so the image is ok. But again, this is really not an article about the artist so I am asking for another reviewer instead of rejecting the nomination. Bruxton (talk) 14:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
second opinion and full review needed. Bruxton (talk) 14:27, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- 13:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
@Bogger and AtticTapestry: I took the liberty of adding bullet points to this, and the article is currently less than 600 characters. A lot of work needs to be done to this very quickly.--Launchballer 12:07, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- I am happy about bullet points for the list. I considered this when writing the article, but since the items are in date order, the section seemed more like a narrative of work done. I am not very concerned as to whether or not this article is used for a DYK. AtticTapestry (talk) 13:27, 28 April 2024 (UTC)