Template:Did you know nominations/Slow River

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 17:34, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Slow River

• ... that
  lesbian romance, features a "sophisticated depiction of environmental management"? Source: ^[1]
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/The Babadook

5x expanded by Vanamonde93 (talk). Self-nominated at 20:50, 25 September 2022 (UTC).

Interesting book, on fine sources, no copyvio obvious. In the hook, I think we can say "features" because it still does. I believe it's a factual plot thing which doesn't need so-and-so said that it featured. (If not we need rewording.) - In the article, the plot sentence about making a living etc seems too complex, - I had to read it twice, and was still not sure I got it. I may be the only one, though. Anyway, if lesbian romance, another woman should be a bit more prominent anyway. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:55, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

"featured" isn't meant to imply it no longer does, but we sometimes use past-tense for works in the past...regardless, I'm fine with "features", changed. Agree that the source is dense, else we could say more about the environmentalism. Thanks. Vanamonde (Talk) 21:00, 26 September 2022 (UTC) I see, you meant the article, not the source. Made a minor tweak, don't want to be too verbose there...Vanamonde (Talk) 21:02, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for changes! I believe "features" suggests more that this is a recent book, not something decades old. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:07, 26 September 2022 (UTC)