Template talk:Atlantic Coast Conference men's basketball coach navbox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconCollege Basketball Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject College Basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
inactive.
NAThis article has been rated as NA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Noting interim coaches

User:Corkythehornetfan added the interim tagging that we use on school coach templates (see here) to note that David Padgett is interim at Louisville. We have not historically done this and my position is that the template is dynamic and lists the ‘’’current’’’ coaches of record anyway, so it is a little irrelevant to list this and clogs up the template to add it. What is consensus? Rikster2 (talk) 17:44, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Time to update it. We need to establish the difference between interim and actual head coaches. BTW, Louisville has an Acting head coach. He isn't the permanent HC. There is a difference. Corky Buzz by the Hornet's Nest 19:27, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I can see both arguments. I think it has to be more of a case-by-case basis. In the Padgett situation, he should be marked as interim because the school has a head coach and he is not the head coach. However, I think for a school that has fired their head coach and named an interim coach (for the year usually) should be listed without the interim coach a la Maurice Joseph last year. Lincolning (talk) 19:48, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Either way we do this, the good thing is that it's not technically incorrect. I would just say don't mark interim for simplicity. Navboxes are to navigate to other subject's, so I'd err on the side of eliminating the other informational aspects inasmuch as possible.—Bagumba (talk) 07:54, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rant: That pesky and unnecessary "pound sign" verbage still exists, when just showing "#" is sufficient, esp. when £ is pound sign.—Bagumba (talk) 07:54, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]