Template talk:Dacian cities

Romania Template‑class

Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. To-do list: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Help GA -status Help WP:GOOD Request an article or create a missing one Assess : Assess all articles tagged for this project that have not been assessed for quality Cleanup : Review the Romania-related cleanup listing Normalize the use of " Northern Bessarabia" (Bessarabian part of Chernivtsi Oblast ) all over Wikipedia Disambiguation : Disambiguate project articles and get points Expand : Expand Postage stamps and postal history of Romania Translate : Translate Romania-related articles from the Romanian Wikipedia Translate and keep in sync with the project versions in other languages: Projet:Roumanie (in French), Proiect:România (in Romanian), Проект:Румыния (in Russian) FC CFR Timișoara . Other : Make use in articles of the newly contributed images (about 5800!!) from the Wiki Loves Monuments Romania 2011 (WLM Romania external site) Review newly created Romania-related articles Check the articles needing expert attention or other work, and help with some of the items Create Awards for WikiProject Romania Contribute photos related to Romania at Commons:WikiProject Romania. Organize Romania related images on Commons. See also media-related tasks

This is very cool! But we need to clarify the template name and/or scope. The cities listed are not only in Dacia but also Moesia, some in Thrace, and even in Dalmatia (considering Roman provinces names/borders). Dacia in Burebista's time did include good parts of Moesia of course. It can simply be called Dacian cities, and then group them by region or list them all as they are.--Codrinb (talk) 15:43, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I've moved the template to it's new name. Any other suggestions? BineMai 15:46, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I do not understand what is the scope of the template. For example, Napoca did not exist in the Dacian kingdom, because it was founded by the Romans. Therefore, I really do not understand what "Dacian" means in the context. Based on the logic of the list, we could, for example, label

Szentgotthard as Roman towns because they are situated in territories that had been for centuries under Roman, even if these towns were established centuries after the Roman withdrawal. Or could we create a template on Roman rulers that includes Queen Elisabeth II, because part of one of her kingdoms used to be part of the Roman Empire? Borsoka (talk) 20:59, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Is Zaldapa (Dacian town) different from Murideva ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.239.218.30 (talk) 08:58, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would be surprised if they are the same. What would make them the same? Location? --Codrin.B (talk) 01:32, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]