Template talk:Fhm

Sports Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles

Template

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state)
* Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.)
* Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing.
* Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity
section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
Expand : Professional sports (crucial article explaining the salaried undertaking of sports)
* Sport industry (currently a sub-stub)
Photo : for pages listed in Category:Wikipedia requested images of sports and games and sub-categories.
Stubs : work on articles in Category:Sports stubs
Update : List of world sports championships
Other :

Translate
the page of sport in each country from corresponding article in other language Wikipedia to English Wikipedia which was marked in red.

olympic
) sports to be part of this project

RfCs: answer requests for comment

Countries Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CountriesWikipedia:WikiProject CountriesTemplate:WikiProject Countriescountry articles

Template

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

WikiProject Countries to-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

WPCountries}} to talk pages of related articles, and assess
.

Men's Issues Template‑class

	This template is within the scope of WikiProject Men's Issues, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Men's Issues articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Men's IssuesWikipedia:WikiProject Men's IssuesTemplate:WikiProject Men's IssuesMen's Issues articles
Template	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 14:40, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fh → Template:Fhm – This template exists to create a link to a national men's field hockey team. A similar Template:Fhw exists for women's field hockey, and renaming this one in the same format clarifies its purpose.
I am sure that the existing name was chosen in good faith, but keeping it at this title conveys a sexist presumption that male is the default. I assume that no such assumption was intended. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:00, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Support as per nominator. Red Slash 23:54, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review
. No further edits should be made to this section.

Comment can we bot replace all current instances of "fh" with "fhm" and repurpose "fh" for something else? (such as mixed gender teams?) -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 04:49, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- We could, but I really don't see the point. Jenks24 (talk) 07:21, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]