Template talk:Regionalliga

Germany Template‑class

	Germany portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Template	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Football: Germany Template‑class

	Association football portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Template	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This template is supported by the German football task force.

Requested move 14 September 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 16:51, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:German Regionalliga (football) → Template:Regionalliga – Align template name with the article title, Regionalliga. S.A. Julio (talk) 13:38, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). TonyBallioni (talk) 15:34, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

S.A. Julio, pageswap has notified that this is a heavily transcluded template. As such, I think its best to exercise caution here and give a comment period through an RM. I'll notify the WikiProject as well. This is a purely procedural actions, and I am neutral. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:34, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per article name. Kante4 (talk) 15:41, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per article name. Why this is a contested discussion when there is no actual opposition is beyond me. --SuperJew (talk) 16:03, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The template says that, but its default language from the link that starts the RM.
  WP:RM/TR is only for requests where there is unlikely to be any opposition. Admins and page movers will frequently send a request to an RM if they are unsure if there would be consensus. In this case, the template was highly transcluded: having a discussion before moving such a visible template ensures that the move is actually in line with consensus, rather than using a low visibility process. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:13, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The template is used on only 13 articles, does not seem "highly transcluded" to me. S.A. Julio (talk) 17:18, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like needless bureaucracy to me. If someone actually opposes they'll contest it, otherwise there's no problem and should be allowed to be done with minimum of fuss. --SuperJew (talk) 21:02, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support Per article name. --Jaellee (talk) 16:07, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.