Template talk:Western Christianity footer

	Christianity Template‑class
Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Alternatively, an independent template using

Please do not discuss in edit summaries as you're doing on Template:Western Christianity footer. The template has a talk page. Please discuss there. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:29, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@

I am not sure what the objection is, and I will not draw conclusions from an edit comment which is not editorial content. My edits on this template come from the concern to present Independent Catholicism as a major branch of (Western) Christianity at the same level with Catholicism and Protestantism, as in this version of the template.

Note for instance how the Oxford Dictionary defines Catholicism as 1. The faith, practice, and church order of the Roman Catholic Church. 1.1 Adherence to the forms of Christian doctrine and practice which are generally regarded as Catholic rather than Protestant or Eastern Orthodox. According to this very standard definition, the doctrine and practice of, for instance, the

Roman Catholic dogma of papal infallibility as defined by the First Vatican Council

(1870).

However, I actually sincerely doubt that this navigation footer really serves a purpose on articles better served with long-standing navigation boxes such as {{

Catholicism}}. Western Christianity is good the the article namespace, but it does not need an intermediary level of distinction in terms of navbox. Not every article needs to be transformed into a navbox. Place Clichy (talk) 16:36, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

This is getting tiresome. We can't expect users to repeat the same kind of discussion in indefinite individual locations. Would you mind to please state the above arguments and all other arguments that you deem relevant at

talk) 15:35, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

To add to the this, neither is your assertion of taxonomy supported by List of Christian denominations. PPEMES (talk) 20:41, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@

Sure. No problem. PPEMES (talk) 12:55, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]