Thomas DiLorenzo

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Thomas DiLorenzo
Austrian School
InfluencesHenry Hazlitt, John T. Flynn[1]

Thomas James DiLorenzo (

Ludwig von Mises Institute.[2][3] He has written books denouncing President Abraham Lincoln.[2][4]

He is a research fellow at

Austrian School of economics.[8] He has spoken in favor of secession and has been described as an ally of, or part of, the neo-Confederate movement.[9][10][11]

Life and work

Thomas James DiLorenzo grew up in western Pennsylvania, descended from Italian immigrants. In an essay he attributed his individualism to playing sports. He began to study libertarianism in college.[12]

He has a BA in Economics from

PhD in Economics from Virginia Tech.[14]

DiLorenzo has taught at the

State University of New York at Buffalo,[15][16] George Mason University,[17] and the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga.[18]

He is a former adjunct fellow of the Center for the Study of American Business at Washington University in St. Louis.[15][19] From 1992 to 2020, he was a professor of economics at Loyola University Maryland Sellinger School of Business.[15] As of 2020, DiLorenzo was no longer listed as active faculty at Loyola University, and instead as a professor emeritus.[3] He is a research fellow at the Independent Institute.[20]

DiLorenzo is a speaker at

LewRockwell.com.[22] He was listed as an affiliated scholar though 2009 of the Institute for the Study of Southern Culture, which is run by the League of the South, a neo-Confederate group.[23][24][10] The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) in 2004 described DiLorenzo as one of 10 key ideologues in the neo-Confederate movement.[11]

Views

DiLorenzo writes about what he calls "the myth of Lincoln" in American history and politics. He has said, "Lincoln is on record time after time rejecting the idea of racial equality. But whenever anyone brings this up, the Lincoln partisans go to the extreme to smear the bearer of bad news."[25][26] DiLorenzo has spoken out in favor of the secession of the Confederate States of America, defending the right of these states to secede from an abolitionist perspective.[27][third-party source needed] He has described himself as a historical revisionist.[10] He has called the American Civil War the "War for Southern Independence".[28]

DiLorenzo is critical of Alexander Hamilton's financial views, the concept of "implied powers" in the Constitution, the existence of a federal bank, and the use of Keynesian economics to increase the national debt.[29]

DiLorenzo is critical of

military interventionism.[30]

Books

DiLorenzo has written extensively on Abraham Lincoln. According to one historian, "Most historians are inclined to dismiss DiLorenzo as a crackpot. But... his books generally sell better than those of academic 'Lincolnologists' and... [his] views help lay the foundation for conservative political action today", historian

David Blight has recently suggested that we ignore these writings at our peril."[9]

DiLorenzo's book The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War is a critical biography published in 2002.[31] Writing for The Daily Beast, Rich Lowry described DiLorenzo's technique in this book as the following: "His scholarship, such as it is, consists of rummaging through the record for anything he can find to damn Lincoln, stripping it of any nuance or context, and piling on pejorative adjectives. In DiLorenzo, the Lincoln-haters have found a champion with the judiciousness and the temperament they deserve."[32]

In a review published by the Ludwig von Mises Institute, David Gordon described DiLorenzo's thesis: Lincoln was a "white supremacist" with no principled interest in abolishing slavery, and believed in a strong central government that imposed high tariffs and a nationalized banking system. He attributes the South's secession to Lincoln's economic policies rather than a desire to preserve slavery. Gordon quotes DiLorenzo: "slavery was already in sharp decline in the border states and the upper South generally, mostly for economic reasons".[33]

Reviewing for The Independent Review, the magazine of

The Independent Institute, a think tank associated with DiLorenzo,[citation needed] Richard M. Gamble of Palm Beach Atlantic University said that the book "manages to raise fresh and morally probing questions" and that DiLorenzo "writes primarily not as a defender of the Old South and its institutions, culture, and traditions, but as a libertarian enemy of the Leviathan state" but bemoans that DiLorenzo was "careless" in his handling of sources and despite his "evident courage and ability", his execution was lacking. Gamble concludes that the book is a "travesty of historical method and documentation". He said the book was plagued by a "labyrinth of [historical and grammatical] errors", and that DiLorenzo has "earned the... ridicule of his critics."[34]

In a review for the Claremont Institute, historian Ken Masugi writes that "DiLorenzo adopts as his own the fundamental mistake of leftist multi-culturalist historians: confusing the issue of race with the much more fundamental one, which was slavery." He noted that in Illinois "the anti-slavery forces actually joined with racists to keep their state free of slavery, and also free of blacks." Masugi called DiLorenzo's work "shabby" and stated that DiLorenzo's treatment of Lincoln was "feckless" and that the book is "truly awful".[35][36] In 2002, DiLorenzo debated Claremont Institute fellow professor Harry V. Jaffa on the merits of Abraham Lincoln's statesmanship before and during the Civil War.[37]

DiLorenzo's book, Lincoln Unmasked: What You're Not Supposed to Know About Dishonest Abe (2007), continues his explorations begun in The Real Lincoln.[38] Reviews in The Washington Post and Publishers Weekly both stated that the book seemed directed at unnamed scholars who had praised Lincoln's contributions. Justin Ewers criticized DiLorenzo, saying this book "is more of a diatribe against a mostly unnamed group of Lincoln scholars than a real historical analysis. His wild assertions – for example, that Lincoln held 'lifelong white supremacist views' – don't help his argument."[39] Publishers Weekly described this as a "laughable screed," in which DiLorenzo "charges that most scholars of the Civil War are part of a 'Lincoln cult';" he particularly attacks scholar Eric Foner, characterizing him and others as "cover-up artists" and "propagandists".[2]

Writing for the Mises Institute, David Gordon summarises DiLorenzo's thesis: that Lincoln opposed the extension of slavery to new states because black labor would compete with white labor; that Lincoln hoped that all blacks would eventually be deported to Africa in order that white laborers could have more work. According to Gordon, DiLorenzo states that Lincoln supported emancipation of slaves only as a wartime expedient to help defeat the South.[40]

In a 2009 review of three newly published books on Lincoln, historian Brian Dirck linked the earlier work of Thomas DiLorenzo with that of

Lerone Bennett, another critic of Lincoln. He wrote that "Few Civil War scholars take Bennett and DiLorenzo seriously, pointing to their narrow political agenda and faulty research."[41]

DiLorenzo's 2008 book Hamilton's Curse: How Jefferson's Arch Enemy Betrayed the American Revolution--and What It Means for Americans Today expands on DiLorenzo's libertarian, small government views and details ideological differences between "Hamiltonians" and "Jeffersonians" in the role of the central government.[42][third-party source needed]

League of the South involvement

In 2009, Indiana University historian Carl R Weinberg wrote in the magazine of the Organization of American Historians that "DiLorenzo has also allied himself with the neo-Confederate League of the South, which shares his view that slavery had little to do with the Civil War and that 'big government' is the root of all evil."[9]

Congressman

Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank noted that the League of the South had listed DiLorenzo on its Web site as an "affiliated scholar" as recently as 2008.[10][46] Milbank also wrote that DiLorenzo had in 2010 told a secessionist Web site, DumpDC, that "secession is not only possible but necessary if any part of America is ever to be considered 'the land of the free' in any meaningful sense".[10]

DiLorenzo denied any affiliation with the group, telling a

LewRockwell.com column, he described his association with the League as limited to "a few lectures on the economics of the Civil War" he gave to The League of the South Institute about thirteen years ago.[48] In a 2005 LewRockwell.com article, DiLorenzo addressed concerns against the League of the South's core beliefs statement stating that neoconservative viewpoints were at odds with the League of the South's statement, leading to vitriol. Further, DiLorenzo argues that the current Republican party is descended, not from the small-government views of Jefferson, but rather from the ideals of the Hamiltonian Federalist Party.[49]

Publications

DiLorenzo has authored several books, including:[50]

References

  1. ^ Thomas DiLorenzo, The New Deal Debunked (again), Mises Daily, September 27, 2004.
  2. ^ a b c "Nonfiction Book Review: Lincoln Unmasked: What You're Not Supposed to Know About Dishonest Abe by Thomas J. DiLorenzo". Publishers Weekly. 2006-08-07. Retrieved 2014-08-13.
  3. ^ a b "The Joseph A. Sellinger, S.J., School of Business and Management – Loyola University Maryland – Acalog ACMS™". catalogue.loyola.edu. Retrieved 2022-11-01.
  4. ISBN 9780807153857
    .
  5. The Independent Institute
    website, accessed November 22, 2013.
  6. ^ "CFACT Board of Advisors". Archived from the original on 2022-03-05. Retrieved 2022-03-05.
  7. ^ Abbeville Institute associates list Archived 2013-12-03 at the Wayback Machine, accessed November 22, 2013.
  8. Ludwig von Mises Institute
    website, August 16, 2010.
  9. ^
    ISSN 0882-228X
    .
  10. ^ a b c d e Milbank, Dana (February 9, 2011). "Ron Paul's economic Rx: a Southern secessionist". The Washington Post. Retrieved 24 November 2013.
  11. ^ a b Beirich, Heidi; Potok, Mark (December 21, 2004). "The Ideologues". Southern Poverty Law Center. Retrieved 2023-10-23.
  12. LewRockwell.com
    , 25 December 2002.
  13. ^ Anthony Wile, "Interview with Thomas James DiLorenzo on Abraham Lincoln, U.S. Authoritarianism and Manipulated History", The Daily Bell, 16 May 2010, published by High Alert Capital Partners.
  14. ^ Sellinger School of Business and Management, Loyola University Maryland Faculty Directory and Sellinger School of Business school staff profile of Thomas DiLorenzo Archived 2013-05-14 at the Wayback Machine, accessed November 22, 2013.
  15. ^ a b c Thomas J. Dilorenzo profile, Contemporary Authors, January 1, 2005
  16. ^ Thomas J. DiLorenoz, Book Review : The Public's Business: The Politics and Practices of Government Corporations, Public Finance Quarterly, Vol. 9, No. 1, January 1981, 117–119
  17. ^ James T. Bennett and Thomas J. DiLorenzo, "Poverty, Politics, and Jurisprudence: Illegalities at the Legal Services Corporation", Policy Analysis No. 49, Cato Institute, February 26, 1985.
  18. ^ Thomas J. DiLorenzo, "The subjectivist roots of James Buchanan's economics", The Review of Austrian Economics, Volume 4, Issue 1, 1990, pp. 180–195.
  19. ^ Thomas J. DiLorenzo, Suburban Legends: Why "Smart Growth" Is Not So Smart Archived 2013-12-12 at the Wayback Machine, Washington University in St. Louis Weidenbaum Center on the Economy, Government, and Public Policy, "Contemporary Issues", Series 97, November 1999.
  20. ^ "Thomas J. DiLorenzo". The Independent Institute. Retrieved 2022-11-01.
  21. Ludwig von Mises Institute
    website, accessed November 22, 2013.
  22. LewRockwell.com
    .
  23. ^ Beirich, Heidi (February 9, 2011). "Ron Paul Invites Neo-Confederate Witness to Testify in Congress". Southern Poverty Law Center. Retrieved 2023-10-23.
  24. ISBN 9781421428598
    .
  25. ^ Thomas DiLorenzo, "Confronting the Lincoln Cult,", Mises Daily, 3 June 2002]
  26. ^ Abraham Lincoln Online: Speeches and Writing. "Letter to Henry L. Pierce and others". Retrieved 26 February 2016.
  27. ^ Thomas DiLorenzo, "An Abolitionist Defends the South,", LewRockwell.com, October 20, 2004].
  28. ISSN 0028-6583
    . Retrieved 2023-10-23.
  29. ISBN 978-0307382856
    .
  30. ^ "Neocons Are Unhinged".
  31. ISBN 978-0307559388
    .
  32. ^ Lowry, Rich (2013-06-17). "The Rancid Abraham Lincoln–Haters of the Libertarian Right". The Daily Beast. Retrieved 2023-06-06.
  33. ^ David Gordon review of Thomas J. DiLorenzo, "The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War" Archived 2014-09-14 at the Wayback Machine, The Mises Review, Vol. 8, No. 2, February 2002.
  34. ^ Gamble, Richard M. "The Real Lincoln: Book review" The Independent Review [1].
  35. ^ Masugi, Ken. "The Unreal Lincoln". Claremont Institute. Archived from the original on 3 December 2013. Retrieved 26 November 2013.
  36. ^ Ken Masugi is an academic in the fields of American history and multiculturalism at Johns Hopkins University and the Claremont Institute. See: "Ken Masugi Faculty bio". Johns Hopkins University. Archived from the original on 27 November 2014. Retrieved 26 November 2013.
  37. ^ Harry V. Jaffa; Thomas J. DiLorenzo (May 7, 2002). "The Real Abraham Lincoln: A Debate". Events. The Independent Institute.
  38. ISBN 030749652X
  39. ^ Ewers, Justin (January 14, 2007). "Memorializing Lincoln". The Washington Post.
  40. ^ David Gordon review of Lincoln Unmasked: What You're Not Supposed to Know About Dishonest Abe, Mises Review, Vol. 13, No. 2, February 2007.
  41. ^ Dirck, Brian. Review: "Father Abraham: Lincoln's Relentless Struggle to End Slavery, and: Act of Justice: Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation and the Law of War, and: Lincoln and Freedom: Slavery, Emancipation, and the Thirteenth Amendment (review)", Civil War History, September 2009, Vol. 55, No. 3; pp. 382–385
  42. OCLC 316835983
    .
  43. ^ Walker, Childs (February 11, 2011). "Loyola professor faces questions about ties to pro-secession group". The Baltimore Sun.
  44. ^ Sullivan, Andy (February 9, 2011). "Paul calls Fed's Bernanke "cocky" in House hearing." Reuters
  45. ^ Walker, Childs (February 11, 2011). "Loyola professor faces questions about ties to pro-secession group." The Baltimore Sun
  46. ^ "League of the South Institute for the Study of Southern History and Culture". Archived from the original on October 29, 2007. Retrieved 2010-01-31.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  47. ^ Burris, Joe (February 14, 2011). "Loyola investigating whether professor has ties to hate group." The Baltimore Sun
  48. ^ "My Associations with Liars, Bigots, and Murderers", Lewrockwell.com, February 11, 2011
  49. ^ "Why They Hate Tom Woods". LewRockwell. Retrieved 2022-11-01.
  50. ^ "Loyola University Maryland, listing of representative publications for Dr. Thomas J. Di Lorenzo". Archived from the original on May 14, 2013.

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Thomas DiLorenzo.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thomas_DiLorenzo&oldid=1210560367"