URI fragment

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

In computer

resource that is subordinate to another, primary resource. The primary resource is identified by a Uniform Resource Identifier
(URI), and the fragment identifier points to the subordinate resource.

The fragment identifier introduced by a

URL for a document. It is typically used to identify a portion of that document. The generic syntax is specified in RFC 3986.[1]
The hash mark separator in URIs is not part of the fragment identifier.

Basics

In URIs, a hash mark # introduces the optional fragment near the end of the URL. The generic RFC 3986 syntax for URIs also allows an optional

MIME type and are evaluated by the client (web browser). Clients are not supposed to send URI fragments to servers when they retrieve a document.[1][2]

A URI ending with # is permitted by the generic syntax and is a kind of empty fragment. In MIME document types such as text/html or any XML type, empty identifiers to match this syntactically legal construct are not permitted. Web browsers typically display the top of the document for an empty fragment.

The fragment identifier functions differently to the rest of the URI: its processing is exclusively client-sided with no participation from the web server, though the server typically helps to determine the MIME type, and the MIME type determines the processing of fragments. When an agent (such as a web browser) requests a web resource from a web server, the agent sends the URI to the server, but does not send the fragment. Instead, the agent waits for the server to send the resource, and then the agent processes the resource according to the document type and fragment value.[3]

In an HTML web page, the agent will look for an anchor identified with an HTML tag that includes an id= or name= attribute equal to the fragment identifier.

Examples

Proposals

Several proposals have been made for fragment identifiers for use with plain text documents (which cannot store anchor metadata), or to refer to locations within HTML documents in which the author has not used anchor tags:

See also

References

  1. ^ a b "RFC 3986 Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax". Internet Engineering Task Force. January 2005. Retrieved 2012-03-06.
  2. ^ R. Fielding, Ed., Adobe; J. Reschke, Ed., greenbytes (June 2014). "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing". Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Retrieved 2023-12-27. The target URI excludes the reference's fragment component, if any, since fragment identifiers are reserved for client-side processing{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  3. W3C
    . 2004. Retrieved 2011-07-13.
  4. W3C
    . 2008. Retrieved 2011-07-13.
  5. W3C
    . 2005. Retrieved 2011-07-13.
  6. ^ "Issue 77024". Chromium. 2011. Retrieved 2011-07-13.
  7. ^ "Media Type Review". W3C Media Fragments Working Group. 2009. Retrieved 2009-04-29.
  8. ^ "New Feature: Link within a Video". 2006-07-19. Retrieved 2011-07-13.
  9. ^ Link to Specific Content in Gmail, Google Blogoscoped, 2007-11-17
  10. ^ Bryan, P (2013-04-02). "RFC 6901 – JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Pointer". The Internet Society. Retrieved 2022-07-14.
  11. ^ "Parameters for Opening PDF Files – Specifying parameters in a URL" (PDF). Adobe. April 2007. Retrieved 2017-09-20.
  12. . Retrieved 2017-09-20.
  13. ^ "Linking – SVG 1.1 (Second Edition)".
  14. ^ "Media Fragments URI 1.0 (basic) W3C Recommendation". Retrieved 2012-09-25.
  15. ^ "Scroll to Text Fragment". Chrome Platform Status. Google Chrome. Retrieved 2020-05-18.
  16. ^ Kelly, Gordon. "Google Chrome 80 Released With Controversial Deep Linking Upgrade". Forbes. Retrieved 2020-06-04.
  17. W3C
    . Retrieved 2020-05-18.
  18. ^ "Pypi md5 check support". Retrieved 2011-07-13. Pypi has the habit to append an md5 fragment to its egg urls, we'll use it to check the already present distribution files in the cache
  19. ^ a b "Hash URIs". W3C Blog. 2011-05-12. Retrieved 2011-07-13.
  20. W3C
    . 2017. Retrieved 2018-08-03.
  21. ^ a b "Proposal for making AJAX crawlable". 2009-10-07. Retrieved 2011-07-13.
  22. ^ "(Specifications) Making AJAX Applications Crawlable". Google Inc. Retrieved 2013-05-04.
  23. ^ "Manipulating the browser history". Mozilla Developer Network. Retrieved 2017-02-23.
  24. ^ "Deprecating our AJAX crawling scheme". Official Google Webmaster Central Blog. Retrieved 2017-02-23.
  25. ^ Fragment Search, gerv.net
  26. ^ Text-Search Fragment Identifiers, K. Yee, Network Working Group, Foresight Institute, March 1998
  27. ^ bmcquade; bokan; nburris (2022-03-24). "Feature: Scroll to Text Fragment". Chrome Platform Status. chromium.org. Retrieved 2022-05-03.
  28. ^ LiveURLs project
  29. ^ The technology behind LiveURLs, accessed 2011-03-13
  30. ^ "Web Marker" Firefox add-on, accessed 2011-03-13
  31. ^ "EPUB Canonical Fragment Identifiers 1.1". idpf.org. Retrieved 2020-06-03.

External links

  • W3C Media Fragments Working Group, establishing a URI syntax and semantics to address media fragments in audiovisual material (such as a region in an image or a sub-clip of a video)
  • MediaMixer Community Portal collects presentations, tutorials, use cases and demonstrators related to use of Media Fragment technology