Upāli
Buddha, Kappitaka | |
---|---|
Period in office | Early Buddhism |
Successor | Dāsaka |
Students
| |
Initiation | Anupiyā by the Buddha |
Upāli (
Scholars have analyzed Upāli's role and that of other disciples in the early texts, and it has been suggested that his role in the texts was emphasized during a period of compiling that stressed monastic discipline, during which
Accounts
Upāli's personality is not depicted extensively in the texts, as the texts mostly emphasize his stereotypical qualities as an expert in monastic discipline, especially so in the
Early life
According to the texts, Upāli was a barber, a despised profession in ancient India.
According to the Mahāvastu, the Pāli
Indologist
Monastic life
Upāli had a dwelling place in
According to the Mahāvastu, the
Role in monastic discipline
In the literature of every Buddhist school, Upāli is depicted as an expert in vinaya and the
Upāli was also known for his strictness in practicing the discipline.[26] Monks considered it a privilege to study the vinaya under him.[27] At times, monks who felt repentance and wanted to improve themselves, sought his advice. In other cases, Upāli was consulted in making decisions considering alleged offenses of monastic discipline. For example, one newly ordained nun was found pregnant, and was judged by the monk Devadatta as unfit to be a nun. However, the Buddha had Upāli do a second investigation, during which Upāli called upon the help of the laywoman Visakhā and several other laypeople. Eventually, Upāli concluded the nun had conceived the child by her husband before her ordination as a nun, and therefore was innocent. The Buddha later praised Upāli for his careful consideration of this matter.[28]
Other notable cases about which Upāli decided are that of the monks Bharukaccha and Ajjuka. Bharukaccha consulted Upāli whether dreaming about having sex with a woman amounted to an offense that required disrobing, and Upāli judged it did not. As for the monk Ajjuka, he had decided about a dispute about real estate.[29] In this case, a rich householder was in doubt as to who he should will his inheritance to, his pious nephew or his own son. He asked Ajjuka to invite for an audience the person who had the most faith of the two—Ajjuka invited the nephew. Angry about the decision, the son accused Ajjuka of partisanship and went to see the monk Ānanda. Ānanda disagreed with Ajjuka's decision, judging the son the more rightful heir, and causing the son to feel justified in accusing Ajjuka of not being a "true monk". When Upāli got involved, however, he judged in favor of Ajjuka. He pointed out to Ānanda that the act of inviting a layperson did not break monastic discipline.[30] Eventually, Ānanda agreed with Upāli, and Upāli was able to settle the issue.[31][32] Here, too, the Buddha praised Upāli for his handling of the case.[33] Law scholar Andrew Huxley noted that Upāli's judgment of this case allowed monks to engage on an ethical level with the world, whereas Ānanda's judgment did not.[34]
First Council and death
![Mural painting with many monks sitting in a cave, one of them seated on a bench](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/eb/Nava_Jetavana_Temple_-_Shravasti_-_013_First_Council_at_Rajagaha_%289241729223%29.jpg/220px-Nava_Jetavana_Temple_-_Shravasti_-_013_First_Council_at_Rajagaha_%289241729223%29.jpg)
According to the
Upāli had a number of pupils, who were called the sattarasavaggiyā.
Previous lives
In some Buddhist texts, an explanation is offered why a low-caste born monk would have such a central role in developing monastic law. The question that might have been raised is whether issuing laws would not normally be associated with kings. The
Despite Upāli's previous lives as a king, he was born as a low caste barber in the time of
Legacy
Upāli was the focus of worship in ancient and medieval India and was regarded as the "patron saint" of monks who specialize in the vinaya.[5][45] He is one of the eight enlightened disciples, and is honored in Burmese ceremonies.[5][46]
Schools and lineages
![Map of Anurudhapura, the city that included the Mahvihara](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3f/Mah%C4%81vih%C4%81ra_on_1890_map_of_Anuradhapura.svg/220px-Mah%C4%81vih%C4%81ra_on_1890_map_of_Anuradhapura.svg.png)
Several scholars have contended that the prominence of certain of the Buddha's disciples in the early texts is indicative of the preference of the compilers. Buddhologist
Upāli's successors formed a
Upāli's lineage has gained scholarly attention because of their way of timekeeping, known by modern scholars as the "dotted record". Chinese sources say that Upāli and his successors had a custom to insert a dot in a manuscript marking each year after the First Council. The sources claim that each of successors continued this tradition, up until 489 CE, when the
Not only in ancient India did certain lineages identify with Upāli. In 7th-century China, the Vinaya or Nan-shan School was founded by the monks Ku-hsin and
Texts
In the Pāli tradition, numerous discourses show the Buddha and Upāli discussing matters of monastic discipline, including the legality of decision-making and assemblies, and the system of giving warnings and probation. Much of this is found in the
Notes
Citations
- ^ Ray 1994, pp. 205–206 note 2a–d.
- ^ Freedman 1977, pp. 67, 231.
- ^ Rhys Davids 1899, p. 102.
- ^ Gombrich 1995, p. 357.
- ^ a b c d e f g Mrozik 2004.
- ^ Bareau 1962, p. 262.
- ^ See Malalasekera (1937, Upāli). For the texts of traditions apart from Pāli, see Freedman (1977, p. 97).
- ^ a b Freedman 1977, p. 117.
- ^ a b Bareau 1988, p. 76.
- ^ Freedman 1977, p. 116.
- ^ Rahula 1978, p. 10.
- ^ Rhys Davids 1903, p. 69.
- ^ Schumann 2004, p. 166.
- ^ Samuels 2007, p. 123.
- ^ Singh 1973, pp. 131–132.
- ^ Malalasekera 1937, Upāli; Vālikārāma.
- ^ Geiger 1912, p. 35.
- ^ Malalasekera 1937, Upāli; Upāli Sutta (3).
- ^ a b c d e f g h Malalasekera 1937, Upāli.
- ^ Freedman 1977, p. 58.
- ^ Freedman 1977, pp. 57 n.60, 97–98.
- ^ Malalasekera 1937, Kappitaka Thera.
- ^ Dhammadinna 2016, pp. 45–46.
- ^ Sarao 2004, p. 878.
- ^ Robinson & Johnson 1997, p. 45.
- ^ Baroni 2002, p. 365.
- ^ Sarao 2003, p. 4.
- ^ Malalasekera 1937, Kumāra-Kassapa; Ramanīyavihārī Thera.
- ^ See Malalasekera (1937, Ajjuka; Bharukaccha). For the other laypeople, see Churn Law (2000, p. 464).
- ^ See Huxley (2010, p. 278). Freedman (1977, pp. 30–32) mentions faith, the son seeing Ānanda, and the accusation of false monkhood.
- ^ Freedman 1977, p. 32.
- ^ Malalasekera 1937, Ajjuka.
- ^ Malalasekera 1961.
- ^ Huxley 2010, p. 278.
- ^ a b Prebish 2008, p. 9.
- ^ Geiger 1912, p. xlviii.
- ^ For the pāṭimokkha, see Norman (1983, pp. 7–12). For the vinaya of both monks and nuns, see Oldenberg (1899, pp. 617–618) and Norman (1983, p. 18).
- ^ Eliade 1982, pp. 210–211.
- ^ Thomas 1951, p. 28.
- ^ See Analayo (2010, p. 17 note 52). For the Mahāsaṃghika, see Analayo (2016, p. 160).
- ^ Malalasekera 1937, Rājagaha.
- ^ Norman 2005, p. 37.
- ^ See Huxley (1996, p. 126 note 27) and Malalasekera (1937, Upāli). Huxley mentions the question raised.
- ^ a b Cutler 1997, p. 66.
- ^ Malalasekera 1937, Hsuan Tsang.
- ^ Strong 1992, p. 240.
- ^ Freedman 1977, pp. 13, 464–465.
- ^ Przyluski 1923, pp. 22–23.
- ^ Freedman 1977, pp. 34–35, 88–89, 110.
- ^ Przyluski 1923, p. 184.
- ^ Migot 1954, pp. 540–541.
- ^ Dutt 1925, pp. 206–207.
- ^ Sarao 2003, p. 3.
- ^ Prebish 2008, p. 2.
- ^ Frasch 1996, pp. 2–4, 12, 14.
- ^ See Prebish (2008, pp. 6–8) and Geiger (1912, p. xlvii).
- ^ For Ku-hsin, the Pa Hwa Hills, the standard and the reincarnation, see Hsiang-Kuang (1956, p. 207). For Tao-hsüan and the monks, see Bapat (1956, pp. 126–127).
- ^ Ray 1994, p. 169.
- ^ Thomas 1951, p. 268.
- ^ For the Mahāyāna influence, see Prebish (2010, p. 305) For the time period, see Agostini (2004, p. 80 n.42).
- ^ a b Norman 1983, p. 29.
- ^ Heirman 2004, p. 377.
- ^ Prebish 2000, pp. 56–57: "... texts worthy of new consideration would also include those with the richest heritage of ethical underpinnings."
References
- Agostini, G. (2004), "Buddhist Sources on Feticide as Distinct from Homicide", Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 27 (1): 63–95, archived from the original on 24 August 2019
- Analayo, B. (2010), "Once Again on Bakkula" (PDF), The Indian International Journal of Buddhist Studies, 11: 1–28, archived (PDF) from the original on 4 March 2020
- ISBN 978-3-89733-387-1, archived(PDF) from the original on 8 December 2018
- Bapat, P. (1956), 2500 Years of Buddhism, OCLC 851201287
- ]
- Baroni, Helen J. (2002), The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Zen Buddhism, ISBN 978-0-8239-2240-6
- Churn Law, B. (2000), A History of Pāli literature (2nd ed.), Indica Books, ISBN 81-86569-18-9
- Cutler, S.M. (1997), "Still Suffering After All These Aeons: The Continuing Effects of the Buddha's Bad Karma", in Connolly, P.; Hamilton, S. (eds.), Indian Insights: Buddhism, Brahmanism and Bhakti: Papers From the Annual Spalding Symposium on Indian Religions, Luzac Oriental, pp. 63–82, ISBN 1-898942-15-3
- Dhammadinna, B. (2016), "The Funeral of Mahāprajāpatī Gautamī and Her Followers in the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya", The Indian International Journal of Buddhist Studies, 17: 25–74, from the original on 2 March 2020
- Dutt, N. (1925), Early History of the Spread of Buddhism and the Buddhist Schools (PDF), Luzac & Co., OCLC 659567197
- ISBN 0-226-20403-0
- Freedman, M. (June 1977), The Characterization of Ānanda in the Pāli Canon of the Theravāda: A Hagiographic Study (PDF) (PhD thesis), McMaster University, archived from the original on 19 September 2018
- Frasch, T. (1996), "An Eminent Buddhist Tradition: The Burmese Vinayadharas", Traditions in Current Perspective: Proceedings of the Conference on Myanmar and Southeast Asian Studies, 15-17 November 1995, Yangon, from the original on 7 March 2020
- OCLC 1049619613
- ISBN 978-0-7103-0444-5
- Heirman, A. (2004), "The Chinese "Samantapāsādikā" and its school affiliation", JSTOR 43381401
- Hsiang-Kuang, C. (1956), A History of Chinese Buddhism, Indo-Chinese Literature Publications, OCLC 553968893
- ISBN 978-1-135-75181-4, archived from the original(PDF) on 21 September 2015
- S2CID 154570006
- OCLC 837021145
- OCLC 2863845613
- Mrozik, S. (2004), "Upāli", MacMillan Encyclopedia of Buddhism, vol. 1, ISBN 0-02-865719-5
- ISBN 3-447-02285-X
- ISBN 978-1-135-75154-8
- JSTOR 43366938
- Prebish, C.S. (2000), "From Monastic Ethics to Modern Society", in ISBN 0-7007-1278-X
- Prebish, C.S. (2008), "Cooking the Buddhist Books: The Implications of the New Dating of the Buddha for the History of Early Indian Buddhism", Journal of Buddhist Ethics, 15: 1–21, CiteSeerX 10.1.1.693.1275
- Prebish, C.S. (2010), Buddhism: A Modern Perspective, ISBN 978-0-271-03803-2
- OCLC 2753753
- Rahula, T. (1978), A Critical Study of the Mahāvastu, OCLC 5680748
- ISBN 0-19-507202-2
- OCLC 17787096
- OCLC 870507941
- Robinson, R.H.; Johnson, W.L. (1997), The Buddhist Religion: A Historical Introduction (4th ed.), ISBN 978-0-534-20718-2
- Samuels, J. (January 2007), "Buddhism and Caste in India and Sri Lanka", Religion Compass, 1 (1): 120–130,
- Sarao, K.T.S. (2003), "The Ācariyaparamparā and Date of the Buddha", S2CID 141897826
- Sarao, K.T.S. (2004), "Upali", in Jestice, P.G. (ed.), Holy People of the World: A Cross-cultural Encyclopedia, ISBN 1-85109-649-3
- Schumann, H.W. (2004) [1982], Der Historische Buddha [The Historical Buddha] (in German), translated by Walshe, M. O' C., ISBN 978-81-208-1817-0
- Singh, Sangh Sen (1973), "The Problem of Leadership in Early Buddhism", Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, 34: 131–139, JSTOR 44138606
- ISBN 0-691-07389-9
- OCLC 923624252