User:CycoMa1/talkpage archive

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Topic ban from medical articles

Hi again. Per the most recent ANI report (

WP:RESTRICT. Thanks. El_C
13:58, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

@El C: is it possible to appeal the topic ban in the future? The reason I’m asking is because I have seen people appeal topic bans at AN.CycoMa1 (talk) 14:10, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Yes, sorry, forgot to mention. The documentation is at
WP:UNBAN. El_C
14:12, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
@El C: can I comment at sex?CycoMa1 (talk) 22:24, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello again, I just learned of the topic ban at FTN but also saw your replies there. Just a notice that it's probably best not to pursue the discussion there, to avoid violating the topic ban (and FTN is not the place for an appeal, of course). —PaleoNeonate – 23:15, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

@PaleoNeonate: that’s why I decided to ask an admin.CycoMa1 (talk) 00:02, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Good idea, —PaleoNeonate – 05:27, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

CycoMa1, I'll preface this by saying that I am not comfortable discussing sex with minors. I do not have a professional background in that area. But, if you were an adult, I'd tell you that the ban allows you discuss any non-clinical facets of sex, like, say, the adult industry or the legal status of sex work (John Oliver ftw again, same ep). On the other hand, lots of anthropology stuff, for example, is likely to skirt the line of

WP:BROADLY, if not cross it (depending on variables that would be difficult to predict). HTH. El_C
11:31, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

@El C: I was talking about this article sex.CycoMa1 (talk) 12:49, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
I know, I saw the link. You are not banned from the page, as mentioned, the prohibition would be about its medical aspects. El_C 13:07, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Oh okay.CycoMa1 (talk) 13:09, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Hmm! VariousDeliciousCheeses (talk) 02:33, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
@VariousDeliciousCheeses: what?
@VariousDeliciousCheeses: please don’t comment useless stuff on my talk page.CycoMa1 (talk) 02:39, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

I’m back/announcement

Hey guys I am back from my long break. I took a long break to re-evaluate myself and do handle things like school or work.

But anyway I decided for now on, I will only edit Wikipedia on weekends and during the summertime. (Since not all of you people are from the United States summer is typical between May and August.)

Also, I put this up to discuss some things y’all here.CycoMa1 (talk) 12:52, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

I may change my schedule to be a weekend only editor.CycoMa1 (talk) 04:26, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Silene acutifolia has been accepted

Silene acutifolia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.


Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its
create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 13:18, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sphagnum contortum

A tag has been placed on

Portal
namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 19:48, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sphagnum contortum has been accepted

Sphagnum contortum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.


Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its
create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 15:43, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rinorea melanodonta has been accepted

Rinorea melanodonta, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.


Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its
create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

97198 (talk) 12:56, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Tetrahymena americanis

request
that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk
) 22:02, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

I might leave this one abandoned.CycoMa1 (talk) 20:21, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lactuca alpestris has been accepted

Lactuca alpestris, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.


Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its
create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 15:51, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Arguments against evolution

I had just posted something I wanted to include in the article when you closed it :/ Subuey (talk) 19:12, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Minervarya keralensis has been accepted

Minervarya keralensis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.


Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 03:44, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Article: Hermaphrodite, un-sourced claim

I read both references in the article Hermaphrodite that refereed to the text "with some biologists saying hermaphroditism cannot occur in humans.", I read them completely. There was no mention at all about it not being possible. It did mention that it has not happened before though. After I made the edit deleting the uncited claim (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hermaphrodite&diff=next&oldid=1097352988) you promptly reverted it back. These citations are 11 ("Phelan J (2009-03-02). What Is Life?: A Guide to Biology w/Prep-U. Macmillan. p. 243. ISBN 978-1-4292-8079-2.") and 12 ("Mills A (2018-01-01). Biology of Sex. University of Toronto Press. p. 309. ISBN 978-1-4875-9337-7."), if you read both these pages you will see that there was no mention at all about it not being possible. As a compromise, I have put a citation needed this time (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hermaphrodite&diff=prev&oldid=1097354908). Jacob81 (talk) 08:21, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

@Jacob81: maybe the wording is off. When I have the time I’ll make that statement align more with the sources.CycoMa1 (talk) 14:36, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
@Jacob81: how about you take this issue to the talk page of that article and wait for someone to respond.CycoMa1 (talk) 14:49, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
@CycoMa1: Thank you. I have just done that. I was actually just about to even before I saw you suggest it. Jacob81 (talk) 16:38, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Betta taeniata has been accepted

Betta taeniata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.


Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its
create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 06:44, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk
) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Modern Meadow review request

Hi there, I proposed some updates to the page about biotech company Modern Meadow, and I think this might be of interest to members of the Biology WikiProject. I see you’re a member of that project who has been actively editing things on Wikipedia during the last six months, and I was wondering if you might be willing to take a look at them? The proposals address the concerns of a flag posted on the article. I have a COI and don’t want to violate Wikipedia rules by editing the page myself. Thanks very much for your time. Olympus4Me2 (talk) 17:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

New Year's Wishes!