User talk:ইউনুছ মিঞা

Hello, YounusMia2003, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:55, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

L

Please see the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bangladesh/Archive 7#Placename changes and Wikipedia policy to understand why Wikipedia uses the spelling it does. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:12, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are multiple ways of transliterating Bengali. When Wikipedia's

Hi YounusMia2003! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Mirsharai Upazila several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Mirsharai Upazila, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:54, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, YounusMia2003,

You were not just edit-warring on this article but on many others. If an editor reverts an edit or move you made, you should either go discuss it on the article talk page or go to the editor's User talk page to ask about it. Edit-warring is one of the most common reasons why editors get blocked and lose their editing privileges.

WP:BRD stands for "Bold-Revert-Discuss" not "Bold-Revert-Revert-Revert-Revert-Get blocked". It's in your best interest to start communicating with your fellow editors when disagreements happen. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:03, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, ইউনুছ মিঞা,

If you keep edit-warring over these page moves, you will receive a block and loss of editing privileges. It's like you haven't been listening to any of these messages. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:17, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! YounusMia2003, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 20:55, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:35, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ইউনুছ মিঞা,

I said I would block you if you continued to move-war and you persisted so you are now blocked. You have to learn how to communicate with your fellow editors instead of just doing whatever you want. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:37, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ইউনুছ মিঞা (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here ইউনুছ মিঞা (talk) 09:03, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:26, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]