User talk:*Kat*/archive2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Re:Honorverse

I'd be happy to help, but do we need a project? I certainly have my hands full with others and could not find time to organize other projects :( Do you know User:Fabartus? He is another barfly active on Wiki and would surely be interested.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 23:03, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PS. I think the most urgent task is to
clear this mess.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 23:24, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply
]
Added Hades (Honorverse) to Hades (disambiguation), I'm surprised it wasn't there already... (Patrick 23:25, 11 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]
Another user adding much honorverse content is User:Yyyyyyyyyyy. I do think it would be nice to have some common discussion page, but perhaps Talk:Honorverse is enough?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 23:02, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your AMA statement was deleted

Your AMA statement was deleted apparently carelessly from the AMA statements page (see this edit)if your statement needs to be restored, the text is at User:Pedant/AMA error Pedant 02:07, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Table on Honorverse Characters

Nothing to be sorry about, it's a valuable addition to the article, kudos for it :) But perhaps we could 'thin it out' by removing some elements repeated in every line...?-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus  talk  14:32, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uklandscape

Hi, you left Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Uklandscape incomplete. I (after a bit of puzzling as to what had gone wrong) completed the nomination. Hopefully you didn't change your mind halfway through, as it's been fully nominated for deletion now. --Xyzzyplugh 10:46, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

WikiThanks
WikiThanks

Thank you for your efforts on the

List of Honorverse characters -- Heptite (T) (C) (@) 06:15, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Coffee's GA nomination

Hello! I saw you left a comment that only a minor thing is needed to be fixed to pass that article. I have concerns about it:

  • the article has several bracket structures (it could be really disturbing to read the text among these)
  • it has 2 citation needed templates.

I think we should wait until these suggestions are fixed. Thanks. NCurse work 14:50, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks *Kat*

Hey Kat, thank you for supporting my recent

Talk) 04:55, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

ADHD FAC

Kat, I know my review may seem harsh to you: my disappointment is with the GA process, which is ineffective and misleading. So many people show up on FAC with an article that just received GA, which means ... nothing. An unreferenced article should never have passed GA, period, and the article is lacking far too many inline citations. I know what you're up against, and the article probably get slammed by all sorts of speculative edits, but if you will thoroughly reference the article, with the highest possible quality sources, you will probably find that the speculative edits will stop, as they did when I rewrote Tourette syndrome. Best, Sandy 21:46, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for saying that. I was a bit stung by your criticism. The thing is, I thought I did have the article fully referenced. There aren't any inline citations because we put all the references down at the bottom of the page.--*Kat* 20:35, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm truly sorry for that, Kat. I probably hit you with a pretty big stick, and it was probably cumulative frustration at the ineffective GA process, finally coming to FAC in a subject area I understood well enough to realize all of the problems with GA promotions, coupled with the frustration at there not being enough other editors to help. Perhaps some of what I went through in developing the TS article will help orient your work. I've been working on it for eight months: it took a lot of networking to eventually find the people who could/would help - it seems there are very few editors who know TS, and that includes the physicians. The Medicine WikiProjects never took an active role, even though I appealed to them many times, but my appeals generated enough interest from a few of the WikiPhysicians who gave me advice about certain aspects of writing a medical article on Wiki and helped with medical peer review. Through my involvement at FAC, I learned who the best copyeditors are. Once the article was better referenced and organized by
WP:MEDMOS forced me to realize where the article was lacking. Along the way, the helpful editors I found peeked in on my progress. I met some great editors, and developed my own peer review system, independent of the Peer Review it had or the Projects or the silly GA. You're up against a lot with the speculative edits that occur in ADHD: I hope you can begin the networking process, locate some of the WikiPhysicians who may be knowledgeable about ADHD to help, and if I can be of any help, that you'll let me know. I've had to learn about ADHD because of the comorbidity with TS: I don't have time to get involved in depth with the article, but if you can begin to address some of the stuff I've mentioned, I can continue to peek in on your progress, as so many others did for me. My suggestion of the two most urgent needs the article has is to 1) take a look at the MEDMOS structure to see where your content area weaknesses are, and 2) get rid of all of the references which aren't top-quality medical references: there is too much disagreement in the field to be relying on sources like ADDResources, Suite101, and so on. The article right now has some information from speculative or non-peer-reviewed sources: you need the best medical consensus to write an encyclopedic article. Again, I'm sorry for the big stick, Best, Sandy 21:38, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
]
Apology accepted. I can understand your frustration. The person who reviewed the article for GA status was a doctor himself, but also fairly new to Wikipedia. Thanks for the advice, I'll definitely be following it. I'm surprised TS is controversial enough to warrant speculative edits. ADHD really hasn't had too much trouble with that sort of thing since Bishonen cleaned up the Positive Aspects and Alternative treatments sections.
I think he's actually a biochemist. He is very well meaning and hard working, but he also conferred the GA to TS, when the article was not comprehensive, not thoroughly referenced, and needed a copy edit :-) It's really hard to find someone on Wiki who knows neuropsychiatric conditions: in fact, I don't think there is anyone. Sandy 22:16, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding
Association of Members' Advocates

Hi, you are receiving this message because you have listed yourself as an active member of

rtinp23 21:12, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Wanted to provide some insight....

Thanks for responding to my postings with a little thought rather than categorical rejection, but then you have always been open minded even when you disagreed with me. As for your experience you may be right. I don't know. But you could be wrong. The quotes were illustrating that even people without ADHD found that drudgery turned into fun. Getting any child to do something that is not pleasurable is a challenge. Freud's discussions of moving children from the pleasure principle to the reality principle is very relevant for all people. There are always bumps in the road and scars left behind. Getting children to "behave" (meaning do what we want them to do rather than what they want to do)was and will always be difficult If you go over my many posts in the discussion sections you will find Castellanos speculations on what he thinks stimulants do by releasing the reward chemical, dopamine. His conclusions are identical to mine (although he feels the problem is fundamentally biological) Interestingly not only bored imprisoned children's minds go elsewhere but anyone who feels they are overmatched, dominated etc. The mind shuts down. Thoughts and actions become twice as difficult im comparison to when we feel capable, stimulated, interested etc. Anyway many depressed people find they can't think, or find everything dull, or too much for them. Dopmamine (in the form of Wellbutrin) brings back their sense of mastery and initiative. So does Ritaline, cocaine, amphetamines (such as Adderall). We don't use these except when we are desperate but they will completely turn around the person's mood.

As for athletes using performance enhancing drugs. Feeling in the attack mode, rather than back on your heels, is a key component in performing well. Hence the "home team advantage" or when you have fans that boo their own players, the home team disadvantage (e.g. Beltran and lately ERod.) When athletes feel up, when they go into a hitting streak and are hot they perform better. When they are in slump the harder they try the worse they become. They turn on themselves, doubt, hesitate, go up to the plate half defeated before they take a swing. So yes something is lacking with ADHD children that is self perpetuating. They don't have a can do feeling, they become easily frustrated, tune out, antsy. Entertaining teachers, a subject that comes easily, or catches their fancy, fun games, supply what the Ritaline artificially does, the same feeling that athletes get when they are in a hitting streak and the fans are cheering. How parents and cultures supply that for their children is the subject of my article (that has been removed from the board). The problem is not with attention per se but with being able to remain on task

I can't tell you how satisfying it is to finally reach someone who wants to discuss the issues Would you mind, by the way if I put your comments and my reply on the general discussion page.

ADHD and WikiProject Psychology

I noticed that you removed the

attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder article. There was a discussion on WikiProject Medicine about whether psychiatry-related topics could be included under WikiProject Psychology or if they should fall only under WikiProject Medicine. The discussion was brief, but everyone seemed okay with psychiatry articles being listed under both WikiProjects. The discussion can be found at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine/Archive 2#Overlap with Psychology WikiProject, and a similar discussion on WikiProject Psychology agreed with it. Most behavioral issues, even those that are biological or neurological in nature, are topics frequently covered in psychology programs and are often researched by psychologists as well as psychiatrists, so I think that the Psychology WikiProject would be relevant to the article. I don't think that it would be misleading, especially if we put the banner for WikiProject Medicine on the talk page as well. —Cswrye 15:11, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Nevermind, the discussion has turned the other way. —Cswrye 16:39, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your input is requested

Your input would be appreciated at this Request for Comments. Kelly Martin (talk) 19:46, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use Images Policy

It is Wikipedia Policy not to use fair use image outside the article namespace, such as you have at

WP:FUP for more information. --MECU≈talk 23:38, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

a request from User: Vaoverland

Hi! I have been working on Wikipedia: WikiProject Virginia and several other projects with User: No1lakersfan most of this past year. He is now a high school senior hopping to gain admittance to one of Virginia's public university for the Fall 2007 semester. Following advice, he has done maintenance and reference adding work, as well spending time on articles. He is a good collaborator and I believe he would enhance our efforts with WP as an administrator and use the additional tools and powers wisely. Since you know me from our past communications, I wanted to request that you consider entering a vote, hopefully in support, if you agree with my judgment and recommendation at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/No1lakersfan 2.


Zametkyn article

DO you have the original Zametkyn article? I red you asked him about his article; Right now there is a doubt about the image in the ADHD article. ¿Is the image an average of all the people´s brain in the study or just compares the brain of one of them with another? --Garrondo 10:55, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have the original, so I don't know the answer. I imagine that the image is of just one person's brain. --*Kat* 21:49, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ^_^

Saber girl08 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Hey! I was just wandering around, and dropped in to leave a note. Have a wonderful day!
Saber girl08 01:33, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ADHD

Hey Kat! Thanks for creating the ADHD pharm article, I've relocated all information in it into a new ADHD Treatment article, if you want to take a look: Attention-Deificit Hyperacitivity Disorder Treatments, I'd love your help on that page too, soo anyway I was instructed by the delete bot to put this on ur user page: ==Speedy deletion of List of prescription medications used to treat Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder== A tag has been placed on List of prescription medications used to treat Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

useless

Under the

see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page
explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria

for companies
. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

I only put useless becuase i've never used that tag before so I just copied it form another page, I found it very useful, before i relocated all the info onto the ADHD treatmen article, (and I didn't know it would say useless, so that's my mistake, it should say EMPTY, or something like that) anyway, thanks againEdward Bower 06:28, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OH and by the way, I also think the psychology bannar should be removed from the ADHD article, anyway I am really excited about this ADHD treatment article, I think it'll be a lot less attached than the ADHD article; I'm trying to give it some stable roots to grow off of.Edward Bower 06:30, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Henrietta Anne Stuart

Hello *Kat*:
We are having a bit of a discussion about the proper title for this article:

Talk:Henrietta Anne, Duchess of Orléans. I would appreciate your input on this issue. JdH 02:00, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

your sandbox2

thanks for putting in the effort I have added an external link to the table pointing to south gujarat univ website. Keep up the good work. Kaushal mehta 12:34, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{User:Lighthead/Photek}}

I was trying to add my userbox to the Userbox/music/artists page; but when I do that the page get's all wonky. How do you recommend I do it. I was trying to add it to the popular artists section; anyway, let me know if you know how to do it. Thanks. þ 06:25, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimania in Atlanta!

Hi! I noticed your involvement on U.S. South-related articles, categories and WikiProjects, and I wanted to let you know about

Atlanta
! If you would like to help, be sure to sign your name to the "In Atlanta" section of the Southeast team portion of the bid if you're in town, or to the "Outside Atlanta" section if you still want to help but don't live in the city or the suburbs. If you would like to contribute more, please write on my talk page, the talk page of the bid, or join us at the #wikimania-atlanta IRC chat on freenode.org. Have a great day!

P.S. While this is a template for maximum efficiency, I would appreciate a note on my talk page so I know you got the message, and what you think. This is time-sensitive, so your urgent cooperation is appreciated. :) Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 03:44, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Progesterex

What Wikipedia is not
").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at

sign your comments
with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 23:14, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Template help please

Is it possible to include <noinclude></noinclude> tags in a transcluded template (so that if the page is transcluded the template isn't transcluded with it)? You're 1st in the "level 3 template experts" (Not for use here - another wiki altogether)
(Btw what's SC doing with that woman on its school board?) TheresaWilson (talk) 17:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Hello *Kat*, I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, you can be trusted to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting

Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck. Acalamari 18:00, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Speedy deletion of Template:FailedGA talkbox

A tag has been placed on

section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion
, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:03, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:GA talkbox

A tag has been placed on

section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion
, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:27, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Honorverse characters

Another editor has added the {{

prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 08:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

AfD nomination of List of Honorverse characters

What Wikipedia is not
").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at

sign your comments
with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 17:59, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]


No content in Category:ReBoot Images

WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 04:30, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Torch (Honorverse)

A

db-author}} to the top of Torch (Honorverse). Jack Merridew 11:25, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of Hades (Honorverse)

A

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --EEMIV (talk) 03:25, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of Gryphon (Honorverse)

A

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --EEMIV (talk) 03:26, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of Manpower Incorporated (Honorverse)

A

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --EEMIV (talk) 06:53, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

AfD nomination of Manpower Incorporated (Honorverse)

I have nominated Manpower Incorporated (Honorverse), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manpower Incorporated (Honorverse). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --EEMIV (talk) 14:08, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:We didn't start the fire

I have nominated

talk) 00:44, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Survey request

Hi,
I need your help. I am working on a research project at Boston College, studying creation of medical information on Wikipedia. You are being contacted, because you have been identified as an important contributor to one or more articles.

Would you will be willing to answer a few questions about your experience? We've done considerable background research, but we would also like to gather the insight of the actual editors. Details about the project can be found at the user page of the project leader, geraldckane. Survey questions can be found at geraldckane/medsurvey. Your privacy and confidentiality will be strictly protected!

The questions should only take a few minutes. I hope you will be willing to complete the survey, as we do value your insight. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Professor Kane if you have any questions.

Thank You, Sam4bc (talk) 15:56, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Piotrus 2

Thank you for your kind words. What spiked your interest in this case? If you have personal experience with some of the editors that you feel could be added to evidence, you are welcome to do so. Otherwise, joining

discussion in the workshop may be interesting, we can certainly use input from neutral editors.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 18:24, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Yes, I do remember our work on HH :) Thank you for your interest. A very interesting new development concerning me
is here.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 23:32, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
That's what you get for being in a spotlight :> --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 01:43, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ADHD editors

Kat, the current problem has been going on since July. Doc James is a newbie, but apparently well-educated in medical matters. He is Canadian, and perhaps naturally, leans toward the points of view that Canadian and British professionals seem to be leaning, from what I can determine. He may be well-educated, but his "bedside manner" translated to Wikipedia collaboration isn't very polished, shall we say. I am into a lot of other WP projects right now and only casually watching and participating in this one. Anyway, that's a little of the back story to help bring you up to speed.

BTW, another newbie editor added some content about Alexander Crichton's work (18th century) which I have checked and seems accurate and germane to the article. I do not know how to format the refs to the book correctly, though. If you have time, would you peak at that section and clean it up a bit. It is outside of the area of interest to the others currently. Cheers, Mark Vaoverland (talk) 20:41, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to Kat's offer to help mediate current ADHD editing issues

No problem :-) I think I need a bit of a break from mediating, anywho. I'll stick around, but right now all I think I can do is offer advice. So message/email/IRC me if you ever have questions you want vague answers to ;-)
Xavexgoem (talk) 19:41, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
I know it's a bit harsh of me, but... ugh. My hope is that people will look at a medcab case and go, look, these people are trying to help but you guys aren't doing anything. I do apologize for my apparent bad faith, but sometimes (just sometimes) calling a spade what it is isn't always a bad thing. At least it clarifies the situation... behavioral first, then content. So I'm hoping they'll sign that thinger (can you?)
Xavexgoem (talk) 22:36, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

your help/ advice would be appreciated now

Hi Kat. Sorry that I blocked your two attempts at mediation (controversy phrase and sources) but I wanted to focus on just the one issue at that time. Every attempt at previous discussion has ended up scattered so the focus in a med cab did help and there now is no futher discussion on the UBC citation. That was a heck of a lot of work to resolve the issue of one citation. Since then, I've been compiling diffs of behaviour which could be used in an

WP:RFC. At this point intervention is welcome. All I ask is that we first focus on behaviour before content. You can attempt mediation and it would be appreciated, it is also very okay if you don't want to do that. I've never filled an RFC and it looks to be a daunting process. If you feel that we have hit a dead end with no other options, I'd like to ask you if you would take part in the RFC. Let me know one way or another. Thanks--scuro (talk) 00:57, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Doc James's RFC

Although you come late to this dispute you can certify it or make comment. That would be done on the RFC page, link bellow. Simply edit this section add your name and sign.

--scuro (talk) 15:38, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for signing on to the RFC. I may need to ask another favour in about 12 hours! Stay posted!.--scuro (talk) 05:56, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Toxic Shock Syndrome request for rollback

Hi Kat - you were the first friendly name that I saw with rollback capabilities; would you be able to rollback toxic shock syndrome to http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Toxic_shock_syndrome&oldid=250696318 - there was a picture that was deleted and vandalism was added afterwards, and once the vandalism was removed it was impossible to revert to the best version. Also, any comments on the situation would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! --Cpt ricard (talk) 02:06, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much! That was fast! --Cpt ricard (talk) 05:07, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:RRR2.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,

discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:15, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

President's day (Honorverse)

A tag has been placed on

criteria for speedy deletion
, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 01:07, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:RRR.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,

Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 20:50, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

AfD nomination of Elysian Space Navy

I have nominated Elysian Space Navy, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elysian Space Navy. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --EEMIV (talk) 19:50, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

an AFD flurry

I've become aware of this in connection to treecat and list of treecats. At least one editor, in an excess of 1) exclusionism when it fails to meet personal taste, or 2) a generally overzealous application of poorly drafted WP policies, or 3) Wikilawyering gone goofy. Perhaps there are other reason...

Anyway, I've thrown in my 2 cents. Perhaps you'd like to throw in yours? We may end up with enough for coffee with the recent reduction in prices of such things. ww (talk) 16:50, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Benden Weyr

I have nominated Benden Weyr, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benden Weyr. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ThemFromSpace 20:51, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ADHD

If you send me an email I can give you a full copy of the review. A little busy right now with other debates to comment much on ADHD.--

talk · contribs · email) 16:37, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Nomination for deletion of Template:FAC talkbox

Template:FAC talkbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. The Evil IP address (talk) 07:16, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:*Kat*/archive2&oldid=1137348432"