User talk:104.34.127.117

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

certain degree of freedom
in what you write.

Welcome

Welcome!

Hi 104.34.127.117! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! --Macrakis (talk) 01:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Information icon Hello, I'm Heyallkatehere. An edit that you recently made to George H. Eldridge seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Heyallkatehere (talk) 21:21, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Kate...I guess I'm a bit confused about my fix being reverted back. The phrase "...and 12 other soldiers were received the Medal of Honor..." doesn't sound at all correct to me. For reference, I'm American and have been working with type professionally for almost 40 years. Maybe "were received" is an overseas expression? Anyway, I'm happy to be corrected if I misunderstand, but "...and 12 other soldiers received the Medal of Honor..." sounds a lot more grammatically correct to my ears. Missterkayare (talk) 23:16, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Ensure quoted statements are presented correctly

Hi. I am watching the article for

policies and guidelines regarding quotations (essay) (in short: accurate reproduction and accreditation attribution required), which in that case would have been to leave it alone. I'm not reverting your change because the failure to verify from the source renders the whole thing impossible to currently determine. Cheers. Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 19:33, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply
]