User talk:109.76.205.197

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions
!

I'm Walter Görlitz, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. Although you're free to perform most tasks on Wikipedia without registering, it's highly recommended you create an account as there are many added benefits. It's private and secure and it's also free, simple, and quick to do.

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:
Introduction to Wikipedia
  The five pillars of Wikipedia
Editing tutorial
  How to edit a page
  Simplified Manual of Style
  The basics of Wikicode
  How to develop an article
How to create an article
  Help pages
  What Wikipedia is not
Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
  Do be bold
  Do assume good faith
  Do be civil
  Do keep cool!
  Do maintain a neutral point of view
  Don't spam
  Don't infringe copyright
  Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest
  Don't commit vandalism
  Don't get blocked
If you need further help, you can:
  Ask a question
or you can:
  Get help at the Teahouse
or even:
  Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
  Fight vandalism
  Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome
  Help contribute to articles
  Perform maintenance tasks
           
  Become a member of a project that interests you
  Help design new templates
  Subscribe and contribute to The Signpost
Translate articles from Wikipedias in other languages

To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. If you register an account, you can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you could put a link to it on your user page.

Please remember to:

  • Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your IP address linked to your contributions page (however, if you create an account, your IP address will be hidden and you will be able to build a custom signature that can link to your own user page), a link to this IP's talk page, and a timestamp.
  • Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

Sincerely, Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:13, 23 October 2020 (UTC)   (Leave me a message)[reply]

Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:13, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to God's Not Dead: A Light in Darkness, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:21, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2020 continued

Hello, can you please stop reverting the edits as you did on Mike Kenny (swimmer), because if you will revert again, I will need to report you, since your reverts are a part

WP:Edit war and cannot be tolerated. Thanks for your understanding.--170.135.176.108 (talk) 16:31, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Also, your edit regarding font sizes in Reza Dana article is blown our of proportions. I seen many articles here use it and it is OK. And with edits such as you did to many of my other articles which I edited, accusing me of disruptive editing (while doing pointless edits of your own), is ridiculous.--170.135.176.108 (talk) 20:39, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While reverted edits by this user which stripped spacing from articles, I pointed to
WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
and rather than following the examples of the templates, documentation and other guidelines.
If you don't want to follow the guidelines then try following the example of
Featured Articles. -- 109.78.203.221 (talk) 16:07, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

October 2020

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Starhops shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --170.135.176.108 (talk) 21:18, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
I reverted several edits by this user, which stripped spaces from articles. His response to my reverting his edits was to accuse me of vandalism. He could have tried
WP:BRD but went straight to the Administrators Noticeboard instead. I disagree. -- 109.78.203.221 (talk) 15:56, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply
]