Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions , such as the edit(s) you made to Cantilever bridge , did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted . Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines . You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia . If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page . Thank you. Muffin(Spreading Democracy, one edit at a time) 18:04, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[ reply ]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cantilever bridge . Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted .
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines , and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges . Thank you. Muffin(Spreading Democracy, one edit at a time) 18:05, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[ reply ]
.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing —especially if you violate the three-revert rule , which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule —should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.At this point, you need to discuss the potential changes on the article's talk pages. In addition to the other concerns changed about your text, you have already violated the three-revert rule, so any further violation after this warning is grounds for a block. —C.Fred (talk ) 19:21, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[ reply ]
]
Hello, I'm Donald Albury . I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Acosta Bridge , but you didn't provide a reliable source . It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners . If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page . Thank you. Donald Albury 12:23, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[ reply ]
Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources . It is considered vandalism , which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing . If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox . Yoshi24517 (Chat ) (Very Busy ) 01:49, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[ reply ]
Not everyone is familiar with the bridge. Removing useful text is a bad idea. - Denimadept (talk ) 16:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[ reply ]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Abby Lee Miller . Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted .
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines , and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges . Thank you. Gottagotospace (talk ) 00:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[ reply ]
The opening sentence of a biography is intended to describe what the person is MOST WELL-KNOWN for. Miller's "fame" is for being the "dance mom." The tax stuff is in the article: no one is trying to erase that about her. Joyous! Noise! 00:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[ reply ]
okay. I thought you were being biased. Thanks for clearing that up, I'll stop. 172.59.210.96 (talk ) 00:44, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[ reply ]
The link to
Interstate 335 (Kansas) in that instance. Please stop changing the link back.
Imzadi 1979 → 01:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
[ reply ]
You asked me in an edit summary to fix it myself. Well, I did. The link before you reverted it was correct, and your continued reversions keeps breaking things. Please stop this. Imzadi 1979 → 01:25, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[ reply ]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The Kip (contribs ) 02:18, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[ reply ]
Anonymous users from this IP address have been
blocked from editing for a period of
1 month for persistently making
disruptive edits .
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's
guide to appealing blocks , then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. —
Ingenuity (
t •
c ) 02:24, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
[ reply ]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in .