User talk:2001:558:6045:A0:391F:B005:179D:8DD9

Hello 2001:558:6045:A0:391F:B005:179D:8DD9, I believe the edit I made was correct, and I know it was correct because I am the credible resource, I am a student at John McGlashan College and got bored so I decided to write about the buildings of the school and other things. I can't find any resources on the internet about the school buildings buildings and thought this could be the first. Cheers Vivian.

You are not a reliable, verifiable source. Any information based on your experience and not on published third-party sources is not acceptable. 2001:558:6045:A0:391F:B005:179D:8DD9 (talk) 02:37, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and

. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Intuitive guide to Wikipedia

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (2001:558:6045:A0:391F:B005:179D:8DD9) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

]

Question

Hey are you a Recent Chances Patroller? You seem to do a lot of vandal revision! Good Job! ♠♥♣Shaun9876♠♥♣ ^Talk 01:48, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Been doing it for years. 2001:558:6045:A0:391F:B005:179D:8DD9 (talk) 01:57, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for patrolling new pages. With the exception of blatant attack pages and hoaxzs, pleae do not tag pages for deletion within 1 minute of creation - we will not delete them that quickly untill we are sure that they will not be expanded. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:40, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You may take as much time to delete as you wish. I will tag articles as I see fit. 2001:558:6045:A0:391F:B005:179D:8DD9 (talk) 02:41, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at

on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's

]

The other editor is repeatedly removing maintenance templates. As the warnings for TDEL states, removing them without correcting the deficiences may be considered vandalism. Thus, I am reverting vandalism and my edits aren't subject to 3RR. 2001:558:6045:A0:391F:B005:179D:8DD9 (talk) 20:07, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 2001:558:6045:A0:391F:B005:179D:8DD9. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Frasilah, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: this is not a hoax - aearch link provided on talk page shows the word, and Google finds it as well. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 22:14, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Glad it all worked out. 2001:558:6045:A0:391F:B005:179D:8DD9 (talk) 22:49, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Next time, please include a comment so you don't look like a vandal. Cheers! --averagejoe (talk) 00:23, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So you admit you didn't look at the actual edit and just assumed an IP editor must be the vandal? Sad, really sad. 2001:558:6045:A0:391F:B005:179D:8DD9 (talk) 00:26, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't admit anything of the kind. Didn't even say anything about vandalism. What I did say was that there is a box below called "Edit summary". That's where you "(Briefly describe the changes you have made)". If you go back to the article, you'll see that a smart user actually did things the right way.Now you have been schooled, and you don't need to be sad any more. Don't take any wooden nickels. --averagejoe (talk) 16:52, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is "Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Fardeen Khan". Thank you! --Guy Macon (talk) 11:33, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the vandalism revert! -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:31, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just out of curiosity, is there any reason why you aren't editing with a

]

Ditto. Get an account and discuss on talk page. COI in itself does not require complete removal of material.

talk) 03:42, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

User:PheonixU

Please do not edit other's user pages. If you have a suggestion, please leave it on their talk pages. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 03:43, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm

]

Halluginogens

My students are currently working on a Wikipedia contributions project. You recently undid an edit on the Hallucinogen page by User:Augustolosilla . Would you mind clarifying your reasons for undoing the edit? This way the students are able to learn about edit criteria and therefore improve their contributions.

Ms. G 04:03, 3 December 2012 (UTC)