User talk:52-whalien

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:33, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 52-whalien! The thread you created at the archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:02, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft does not establish that a stand-alone article is needed for this company and record label separate from its parent company

Enhyphen

. If this company is considered independently notable, please provide an explanation of notability either in AFC comments or on the draft talk page, when resubmitting.

Does the author of this draft have any sort of financial or other connection with the subject of this draft? Please read

disclosures

.

You may ask for advice about

the Teahouse

.

If this draft is resubmitted without addressing the question about conflict of interest, it may be Rejected or

nominated for deletion

.

This draft has been declined because of

notability

concerns. This draft should be resubmitted by addressing the notability concerns in AFC comments or on the talk page of the draft. Do not resubmit this draft without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion. Do not simply add references, or make minor changes, without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the

the Teahouse

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Belift Lab and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Belift Lab, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:35, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bighit rebranded the entire company and some of their sublabels. They have just premiered a whole presentation video regarding the rebranding. 52-whalien (talk) 03:39, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@52-whalien: Yes, I am aware of that, however the changes should be moved as page move instead else the article title would say Big Hit Entertainment whereas the content would say HYPE and Big Hit Music respectively. For your understanding, the current Big Hit Entertainment is to be renamed to Big Hit Music and Big Hit Music would be one of the subsidiary of HYPE Corporation which is a parent/holding company. In addition, you already participated in the discussion on Big Hit Entertainment article talk page hence I believe you're aware of that discussion as well. — Paper9oll (📣 • 📝) 07:02, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I understand! 52-whalien (talk) 07:09, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pdogg, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

L293D (☎ • ✎) 18:29, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 52-whalien,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Govvy (talk) 23:38, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That new account is clearly continuing the editing patterns of that edit-warring one. I'd suggest reporting them at

Thanks for the advice! It seems that person has already been reported. 52-whalien (talk) 23:59, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 52-whalien! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Requested move at Jimin (singer, born 1995), has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:01, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply ]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

my edit(and some other editors) is not disruptive editing. i edit with the fact with reliable sources. Members' withdrawal is a fait accompli. but the user Btspurplegalaxy and Paper9oll don't acccept it. they reverted my edit and put some "do not move" after the correction of my edit. 121.133.40.84 (talk) 10:44, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're clearly doing

WP:DISRUPTIVE, which isn't acceptable. 52-whalien (talk) 10:51, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

editing the fact is not wrong. it is just Btspurplegalaxy and Paper9oll don't acccept it. 121.133.40.84 (talk) 11:07, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of what those editors think, your behavior is still uncalled-for. 52-whalien (talk) 11:09, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

they said "give the reliable sources!" and i did it. but they just reverts the article again and again. Disruptive editing is what they did, not me. 121.133.40.84 (talk) 11:11, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You still continued editing however you liked. We editors have to follow the guidelines on here. Everything always has a

WP:CON between editors. You clearly went against editors that had an established consensus. Your inappropriate behavior will have you blocked from editing. 52-whalien (talk) 11:18, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]