User talk:82.42.38.65

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Vaseegara, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. E6400 (talk) 20:09, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Vaseegara. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. E6400 (talk) 20:12, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Chocklet you may be blocked from editing. Janan2025 (talk) 17:34, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

While I would say 85% of your edits are useful, I would say 15% are not. You added three names to the end of the cast of

I'm sure your new here. At first I got confused that [1] was a spam edit but later realised you added names from different films because the actors without names that are randomly added by IPs are usually removed and the actors that you added are actually in the film albeit with different character names.

P. S. I hope you are not the The IP from France (gelocated is eerily close [2]) but even if you are I don't have any basis of reporting you since you made no spam edits. DareshMohan (talk) 07:36, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What's the issue with updating tables? [3] [4]. DareshMohan (talk) 08:25, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Either add it as _Name_'s friend or don't add it. DareshMohan (talk) 17:17, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kaatrullavarai credits [5] until 54 seconds. The added name of Vijayakumar (விஜயகுமார்) is not in the opening credits where all of the other actors are mentioned. [6]

Chocklet opening and end credits [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]. The added name of Vaiyapuri (வையாபுரி) is not in the full credits where all of the other actors are mentioned. [12]

Just to confirm that these actors aren't in the film, I watched each of the films by forwarding 10-30 seconds at a time.

On what basis did you add these names? See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1183#IP adds cast members without discussion. The reverting of my correct edits proof that they are related to the France IP.

Can you block them from editing these 2 pages? @The Bushranger:

Since you didn't comment at this ANI, wondering what your comments are @Kailash29792:.DareshMohan (talk) 18:22, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I wasn't informed of this discussion. In the case of Kaatrullavarai, are there end credits as proof? If not, the IP is wrong. When the name is missing in the intro credits, it would be in the end credits. If not, and there is no other way to prove it, too bad. Kailash29792 (talk) 18:59, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: The name is not in the end credits either [13]. I've checked the film for possible uncredited roles but no luck.

P. S. The role of Iyer was played by another actor: [14] [15]. What are they trying to proof? For photo evidence, see User talk:Srivin#The role of Iyer. Any follower of Tamil cinema knows that the guy on the right is not Vaiyapuri [16]. DareshMohan (talk) 19:37, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They reinstated their edits again. [17]. DareshMohan (talk) 08:17, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Aadirulez8. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ragasya, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aadirulez8 (talk) 19:06, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Izno (talk) 22:55, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.