User talk:A5b

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome Hello A5b and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm glad you've chosen to join us. This is a great project with lots of dedicated people, which might seem intimidating at times, but don't let anything discourage you.
etiquette like signing your comments with four tildes like this: ~~~~ If you have any more questions, always feel free to ask me anything on my talk page or ask the true experts at Wikipedia:Help desk. Again, welcome! -- Draeco 06:41, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply
]

Thanks! I'm already have some contributions to the project, i was User:194.85.82.121 A5b 06:48, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

CBOSS

Hi. Just so you know, the "right" way to object to a proposed deletion is simply by removing the template. (But don't do this for AfD's. You can tell the difference because the AfD template says not to remove it.) I did this for you on

CBOSS, but I'd recommend that instead of adding notability information to the talk page, please put it directly into the article. Thanks for your contributions! NickelShoe 17:50, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Your recent edit to

Tawkerbot2 20:02, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Sorry, my computer was not locked from accessing by vandal. I'll change user policy of my multi-user system. Please unblock. `A5b 17:12, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unblocked, assuming good faith.
T+C) at 06:48 UTC (2006-05-26
)
Thnx. Continue writing articles and link ru: and en:. `A5b 13:22, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Port Scanners

Hi, I see you've made an edit in addition to my changes to the Port Scanner article. That was my first forray into writing on Wikipedia. I'd be interested on any feedback you have on my work. I realise I haven't included references, which is bad. Most references would be less reliable than the normal "peer reviewed journals" standard, but I expect would be enough. For example, http://insecure.org/nmap/man/

I have been considering adding a lot of information to the articles on computer security, particularly pen testing tools. One thing I am worried about is the "no original research" criteria. There's a bunch of stuff I could write about that isn't really original, it's just not widely documented. Would this be appropriate for Wikipedia? Perhaps you know of another project that does allow orginal research.

Regards,

Paj28 21:59, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Dont' worry about original research, many articles in that area must be good sources for information. I think this is appropriate for wiki. a5b 21:38, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possible russian

Hi. I am wondering if you could help me identify the language spoken in this short audio file: [1]. One actor by the name of "Árni Bergmann" is credited as a Russian bishop. And that's what leads me to believe that the language might be russian. Can you help? --Steinninn 08:08, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I can't listen this file. `a5b 12:02, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
First part of this audio file contains a non-Russian speach - it might be Moldavian or Romanian. But after first part of the speach there is a translation of first part into Russian with some accent - it might be also moldavian or romanian accent. 18:44, 17 January 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hhhggg (talkcontribs)

Bee GNU/Hurd

A {{

db-author}}. mms 20:51, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

SCIB
& interwiki

The problem in

SCIB was not with interwiki, it was with one of the other language wikis, Esperanto, Slovenčina, Slovenščina, Русский. Someone added the de: article, resulting in bots adding it to all the other languages. I removed it from all four languages and it should be fine now. Just thought you'd like to know for the future, I had to discover this myself. --Muhandes (talk) 13:35, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Hi. I see you in other wikis. Thanks! There was artikel in de:~, but it was deleted: [2]. `a5b (talk) 17:58, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for
SCIB

SCIB, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 12:02, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Passable so far. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 22:47, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is

WP:MINOR
). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of

talk) 19:07, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The article Lee Zaituni has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per
WP:BLP1E
, this should be an article on the accident if notable; however, the accident itself does not seem notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Inks.LWC (talk) 01:10, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. How can I check, is the accident notable by itself? Almost every Israely newspaper and radio talks a lot about this accident. There are lot english sources too. [3] `a5b (talk) 01:15, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Olympus mons WikiMiniAtlas

I already corrected the coordinate in the article. I'm reextracting the en.p coordinates later today. That should fix the position. --Dschwen 18:37, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this fix. `a5b (talk) 18:47, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. When you recently edited Perf (Linux), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SH (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:20, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of
MMM-2011
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

MMM-2011 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MMM-2011 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.. Monty845 02:54, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Articles for Creation
. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Speedy deletion nomination of Graph500

Hello A5b,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged

promotion
, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Midhart90 (talk) 20:39, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

Nuclear ambiguity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ajax app

I hear you when you say "not a promotional page to commercial comics. This is 5$ app; and it is APPL only app. Deleted www.cognitocomics.com/operationajax/" here but I disagree, in the end, with your deletion. All media are paid, one way or another; more and more Western "newspapers" on line are part or all behind

Andy Duncan (musician). I hope, even with that last, that you'll consider these thoughts and reconsider your action. Swliv (talk) 05:31, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Fully citing refs

A5b, when you add refs to articles (such as

talk) 07:31, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

re Defense Distributed STL's on commons

That's up to you, I started a discussion about that at commons:Commons:Village_pump#Licensing_status_of_Defense_Distributed_software_products. I'm going to upload the practice gun, as that one should have zero problems.

For whichever other ones you were thinking of uploading, I'd suggest you start a new thread to discuss them first, at commons:Commons:Village pump.

Cirt (talk) 02:56, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't figure it out, any idea how to upload images to Wikimedia Commons related to the practice gun? — Cirt (talk) 03:25, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

answer on ecat

Hi. What is your personal opinion about the 1305.3913 test? Is E-cat "true" or "hoax"? `a5b (talk) 9:28 pm, Today (UTC−7)

One obviously wants everything to be tested all the time .... but I think it proves the eCat works. (I've previously said that it's been proved by the "preponderance of evidence", but this paper upgrades it to "beyond reasonable doubt") You can read my take on whether the eCat is real or fake at : http://lenr.qumbu.com and (in particular http://lenr.qumbu.com/rossi_ecat_proof_frames_v430.php) Alanf777 (talk) 04:57, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Intermodal container, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Research Council (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of CBOSS Corporation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CBOSS Corporation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CBOSS Corporation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CorporateM (Talk) 02:50, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited CBOSS Corporation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page O2 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

Snappy (software), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lua (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Achronix, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

Userfication
of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

WP:REFUND/G13
.

Thank you for your attention.

talk) 16:41, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Articles for Creation
. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Just to let you know: I've started an AfD discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Primecoin. If you are interested, feel free to provide your opinions. Thanks! --benlisquareTCE 10:25, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dead OEIS links

Special:LinkSearch is helpful to find links to dead url's. It appears from [4] there are only two more links of that type to fix so a bot would be overkill. PrimeHunter (talk) 14:23, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Qualcomm Hexagon, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages FSF and GCC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Isotopes of lithium

I couldn't figure out what the anonymous editor was trying to do with the table, but introducing values of "0s" for half life and putting "He3" in a spin column was pretty messed up. I simply reverted back to the original table and re-inserted your wordsmithing on lithium-7 enriched material. Regards,

talk) 13:39, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Please take note of this discussion. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 00:00, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Possibly unfree File:Muppets at Museum of American History.Kermit.jpg

Stefan2 (talk) 18:20, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

Reference errors on 1 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

false positive, you can report it to my operator
. Thanks,
talk) 00:14, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom Elections 2016
: Voting now open!

Hello, A5b. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tommy_Gregory_Thompson

Do you mind to review page Tommy_Gregory_Thompson I created so that box of unreviewed might disappear? thank you and happy new year LairdUnlimited (talk) 18:41, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

KRACK

@

WP:PING, as I am not watching your talk page. Thanks! Zazpot (talk) 02:46, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, A5b. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, A5b. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, A5b. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar For You!

The Bio-star
For your contributions to Wikipedia's medical database.
talk) 01:13, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply
]


ArbCom 2019 election voter message

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply
]