User:Mms

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
… this time she found a little bottle on it (“which certainly was not here before,” said Alice), and tied round the neck of the bottle was a paper label, with the words “DRINK ME” beautifully printed on it in large letters.[1]

Vendetta against me in de.WP

Jimbo Wales: “I got something better to do than bother with crap like this.”

After joining

Jimbo Wales in hope he would speak out against this plan. This provocative language earned my another ban of one hour. An IP address started discussion on my user talk page
if I offended the German law by using a swastika in my babelbox (in discussions). I again touched upon the fascistoid disposition of some admins. Asked by another admin how I decide—to cooperate productively or to fight against the “fascistoid admin clique”—I replied that productive cooperation is only possible after the fascistoid admin clique is disempowered. The admin misunderstood my answer as if I wanted to be blocked and blocked me for a year. Another member of the tag team blocked me from editing my talk page, too. The content of my user page is replaced by a text stating I were blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia. I have always thought a fair trial is required for blocking a real user for such a long period of time.

My guess is that they mainly got perturbed by my repeated declaration that Wikipedia is for everyone and therefore it is for Neo-Nazis and every other imaginable group.

policies don’t prohibit them to become Wikipedians. The idea one could have already welcomed Neo-Nazis, misogynists, child molesters and the like at Wikipedia may be terrifying but this is just a question of likeliness which depends on the quantity of your welcome messages. If you want to change this situation, change the license and our policies but don’t block users for stating their opinion—especially when it is an deduction
from our main principles.

The disclosure on Jimbo’s talk page of my naming him our “Führer” caused sensation which missed the point I think. At least the first reactions in the English-speaking world are quite the opposite of what I read on de.wikipedia.org as they don’t worry about Nazis at Wikipedia so much and keep their countenance.[1]

Update: 3. Feb. 2008

After a few months I

troll. I have to take action to kick these judges out of court. The next election of the Arbitration Committee in de.WP is in May 2008. --mms (talk
) 13:05, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Templates

Greeting messages to new Wikipedians

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Alternative templates: Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome templates

More Templates

  • Talk pages
    • {{Unsigned|| (UTC)}}
    • {{Talkheader}}
  • Articles
    • [[Image:|thumb|]]
    • {{Fact|{{subst:DATE}}}}
    • {{Dubious|{{subst:DATE}}}}
    • {{Or|{{subst:DATE}}}}
    • {{Section-stub}}
    • {{Inuse|30 minutes to fix the information in the History section}}
    • {{Refimprove|{{subst:DATE}}}}
    • {{Unreferenced|{{subst:DATE}}}}
    • {{Unreferencedsection|{{subst:DATE}}}}
    • {{Cleanup|{{subst:DATE}}}}
    • {{Expand|{{subst:DATE}}}}
    • {{TotallyDisputed|{{subst:DATE}}}}
    • {{POV||{{subst:DATE}}}}
    • {{Articleissues}}
    • {{Main|}}
    • {{Further|}}
    • {{See also|}}
    • {{Commons|}}
    • {{Notpropaganda}}
    • {{skiptotoctalk}}
    • {{calm talk}}

Even more:

Repository

Contributions

I’m contributing to Wikipedia since 19 years.

English speaking Wikipedia

mms (talk · contribs)

Articles and templates I created

Articles I greatly improved

  • Society
    • Charlton Heston: added that he is a human rights and civil rights activist
    • Max Stirner: I did't improve the article, yet. But I convinced philosophers that Max Stirner “is vital to understanding philosophy”. After reading their importance scale I didn't dare to demand this label of “high” importance[2] but my reasons have convinced them[3]:

Max Stirner This article is at least of mid importance. Max Stirner is the author of The Ego and Its Own for which Karl Marx wrote a critique which he never published. Friedrich Nietzsche never refered to Stirner but Wilhelm Reich did.

  • Drugs
    • War on Drugs‎
      : added the criticism on legitimacy
  • Software
    • Linux: changed POV: the operating system (GNU) started 1983, the kernel Linux was initially proprietary
    • History of Linux: changed POV: the operating system (GNU) started 1983, the kernel Linux was initially proprietary
    • Open source: added criticism by the FSF, added sources, changed POV: Open Source is not a philosophy but a set of principles and practices
    • Open source movement
    • Comparison of Windows and Linux‎: added FSF’s free software definition, added history bit, linked to free software
    • Comparison of open source and closed source
      : changed POV: most Linux distributions distribute proprietary software, GNU is an operating system (not a set of tools), “commercial” isn’t synonymous to “proprietary”, low price is definitely not a key strength of “Linux” but freedom of usage is

Articles I touched

  • Cycling
    • Segregated cycle facilities

German speaking Wikipedia

de:mms (talk · contribs)

Articles and categories I created

Articles I greatly improved

  • Cycling

Articles I touched

Conflicts

German speaking Wikipedia

Links

Findings in the user and WP namespace

English speaking Wikipedia

German speaking Wikipedia

Call to action

References