User talk:Abasin

• Please use
  block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism
  .
• Cluebot produces very few
  false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here
  , remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning:
  talk) 23:32, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]

talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:11, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. I am an Afghan wikipedian as well. I hope we can work together to expand and improve Afghanistan related content here in Wikipedia (Ofcourse, we have to be patient and respectful to each other). By the way, what is your e-mail? (Ketabtoon (talk) 04:49, 29 January 2010 (UTC))[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for continued disruptive editing - including removal of content from another user's page. Should you return to such editing upon the conclusion of your block you will be indefinitely blocked. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. --VirtualSteve ^{need admin support?} 19:09, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abasin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

this is the second time that

Jamal-al-Din Afghani and Ahmad Shah Baba to VirtualSteve. I have edited with academic sources but i have removed some the artikels, which they call sources, it where from Britanica and Persian enclopendia. But i was new here and i don't know you may remove this links to this enclopenias. The user inout18 don't say anything to me but go to VirtualSteve and ask to block me. VirtualSteve saw only my edites, this where gived by user inuit18 to VirtualSteve and VirtualSteve don't even look where it was about, what was writed in talk page of this artikels, maybe don't even look to the sources (what i have present it there) and don't even talk with me, he saw only i have removed this links, so he blocked me. So, i want to have a discussion with this user VirtualSteve and talk about this things with him. because the user User:inuit18 is a racist of Persian origins and a terrorist of Afghan history. He edited and write wrong information about Afghans and Afghanistan and he talk very racistly in talk pages about Afghans and Afghanistan and don't respect the history of Afghan and Afghanistan, but he don't do this with his user account inuit18 but only with his ip address. for example look to this, with ip address: 94.219.218.150 [1] and here is all what he has writed and edited with his ip address: 94.219.218.150 [2]. This user inuit18 do this not only with me like this but with everyone who want to come with facts about Afghans and Afghanistan, to give to the world people information about Afghans and Afghanistan and he try to give the world people wrong information or in only of the view point of Persians. To reach his goal, he have maded VirtualSteve his friend and us the user VirtualSteve rang of admin. for example look to the talk page of VirtualSteve [3] and look to the users, which he has gived their accounts names to VirtualSteve, where he go to VirtaulSteve as a child and to tell VirtualSteve he have writed this and this, he have removed this and this. So i ask VirtualSteve or someone else who is admin to unblock me and talk with me and to look to this talk page about academic sources .. [4]. Thanks in advance, User Abasin/Tofaan.Abasin-اباسین 14:15, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Decline reason:

Conversation below, plus

TLDR-ishness. — Daniel Case (talk) 15:47, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abasin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

this is the second time that

Jamal-al-Din Afghani and Ahmad Shah Baba to VirtualSteve. I have edited with academic sources but i have removed some the artikels, which they call sources, it where from Britanica and Persian enclopendia. But i was new here and i don't know you may remove this links to this enclopenias. The user inout18 don't say anything to me but go to VirtualSteve and ask to block me. VirtualSteve saw only my edites, this where gived by user inuit18 to VirtualSteve and VirtualSteve don't even look where it was about, what was writed in talk page of this artikels, maybe don't even look to the sources (what i have present it there) and don't even talk with me, he saw only i have removed this links, so he blocked me. So, i want to have a discussion with this user VirtualSteve and talk about this things with him. because the user User:inuit18 is a racist of Persian origins and a terrorist of Afghan history. He edited and write wrong information about Afghans and Afghanistan and he talk very racistly in talk pages about Afghans and Afghanistan and don't respect the history of Afghan and Afghanistan, but he don't do this with his user account inuit18 but only with his ip address. for example look to this, with ip address: 94.219.218.150 [5] and here is all what he has writed and edited with his ip address: 94.219.218.150 [6]. This user inuit18 do this not only with me like this but with everyone who want to come with facts about Afghans and Afghanistan, to give to the world people information about Afghans and Afghanistan and he try to give the world people wrong information or in only of the view point of Persians. To reach his goal, he have maded VirtualSteve his friend and us the user VirtualSteve rang of admin. for example look to the talk page of VirtualSteve [7] and look to the users, which he has gived their accounts names to VirtualSteve, where he go to VirtaulSteve as a child and to tell VirtualSteve he have writed this and this, he have removed this and this. So i ask VirtualSteve or someone else who is admin to unblock me and talk with me and to look to this talk page about academic sources .. [8]. Thanks in advance, User Abasin/Tofaan.Abasin-اباسین 14:15, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Decline reason:

This doesn't appear to have anything to do with the reason for your block. I followed the links you indicated, but all they led to was a conversation in which you were attempting to use Facebook and WikiAnswers as if they were real sources. You seem to be trying to use Wikipedia to fight out some nationalist battle that I couldn't care less about; Wikipedia is not a battleground. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:23, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Decline; This doesn't appear to have anything to do with the reason for your block. I followed the links you indicated, but all they led to was a conversation in which you were attempting to use Facebook and WikiAnswers as if they were real sources. You seem to be trying to use Wikipedia to fight out some nationalist battle that I couldn't care less about; Wikipedia is not a battleground. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:23, 30 January 2010 (UTC)}} By the way, could you put new material at the bottom of your talk page? The order of things on this talk page was very confusing to read; I tried to put it back in chronological order for you. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:24, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, miss FisherQueen, are you a admin..? if yes, than why you only picked from 18 links, only facebook and wikianswers...? there are also very good sources in it, for example, about Jamal-al-Din Afghani 1. www.Afghan-Network.net [9] 2. www.studying-islam.org [10] 3. www.scribd.com [11] 4. www.afghanan.net [12] 5. www.laghman.net [13] 6. krex.k-state.edu [14] 7. lsinsight.org [15] 8. www.america.gov , U.S. Helps Restore a Monument to Afghanistan’s Proud Past 19th Century Afghan Thinker Sayed Jamaludin al-Afghani Honored [16] 9. www.renaissance.com [17] 10. www.afghansite.com [18] 11. www.afghanland.com [19] 12. knol.google.com [20] 13. www.scribd.com , Important Dates in the Life of Sayed Jamaluddin Afghani [21] and about Ahmad Shah Baba (Book title: African Americans at war, An Encyclopendia) (Subtitle: Conflict in Afghanistan: a historical encyclopedia) (Author: Frank Clements) and here about Ahmad Shah Baba/Ahmad Shah Durrani/Ahmad Shah Abdali [22] and this book (title: Die Geschichte Afghanistans: das historische Umfeld Afghanistans über 1500 Jahre), (Author: Habibo Brechna) Ahmad Shah Baba here [23]. I hope that this will change your mind. I am not to fight, i am here give Facts about Afghans and Afghanistan. I am sure you have don't even read it. you have see the links and picked only facebook and wikianswers from it. Be a litle bite honest and don't choice a side please. if you still think that my block is right, than it saids enough about the English wikipedia admins. Watch dutch wikipedia about this persons there i am welcome with this information and they have accepted. they are honest admins, and i will also talk them about this, because this not right! i hope you think once again about this block.Abasin-اباسین 15:12, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Only admins are allowed to review unblocks, and FisherQueen is one of the fair ones who does their research. In her decline, she referred to you not addressing the reason for the block, which is "72 hours for continued disruptive editing - including removal of content from another user's page". The discussion of some of you links was an aside, although one you need to pay close attention to - re-adding inappropriate links is a reason for blocking. (

BWilkins ←track) 15:45, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

so you want to say what the User:inuit18 is doing is right..? And about User:FisherQueen i don't know her, so i have no reason to say she is not fair. but what i want to say is, it's not fair to pick only facebook and wikianswers from 20 articles about Ahmad Shah Baba and Jamal-al-Din Afghani. look to my sources what i have posted to FisherQueen, here abrove. Even her own Goverment is recognises Jamal-al-Din Afghani as a Afghan proud, here once again. www.america.gov , U.S. Helps Restore a Monument to Afghanistan’s Proud Past 19th Century Afghan Thinker Sayed Jamaludin al-Afghani Honored [24]Abasin-اباسین 16:05, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As

Bwilkins pointed out, that is not the reason I declined your unblock. I followed the links that you provided as reasons that you should be unblocked, but none of them showed reasons why you should be unblocked. Your unblock request only talked about other people's behavior, and didn't address your own, so I couldn't tell whether you understand why you were blocked, or whether you have any plan to edit differently in the future. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 01:33, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abasin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

i cann't edite talk pages so, this the only possibility to talk with admins, to let them know that i have edited my talk page, so they can review it. Abasin-اباسین 16:33, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for your block. I have restored a declined unblock request above and remove your access to this talk page.  Sandstein  17:12, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

i have tell miss FisherQueen the reason and addressed some good sources but miss FisherQueen is taking from 20 articles (14 sources and some links where they write the birthplace of

I believe you meant to post this here? Daniel Case (talk) 19:54, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I got that too. I think they believe we're

BWilkins ←track) 13:48, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued disruptive editing, name-calling, harassment, personal attacks etc as detailed here. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. --VirtualSteve ^{need admin support?} 21:08, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hey dude, why are you getting on SineBot's case? It's a frickking bot! It didn't even do nothing to you!

The file File:Wrong Path poster.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Personal file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:07, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]