User talk:Aeon17x

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. triwbe (talk) 07:48, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In case it does get deleted before you find refs I made a copy of it in your personal sandbox User:Aeon17x/Sandbox. --triwbe (talk) 08:23, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that, I was worried it might be gone before I get home. I'm working on the main article now. --Aeon17x (talk) 09:56, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re this. I don't know how those dates got changed, 'cause I was nowhere near it, nor how another post got deleted, 'cause it was there (AFAIK) when I closed the page again. TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 14:06, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a

Thanks, I'll look into it. --Aeon17x (talk) 12:29, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That was a terrible idea. Please avoid offsite

Hello, you've mentioned that you've agreed with the changing the name bit, & in the discussion page you've shown some stuff that they mostly use Stadfeld instead of Kozuki, & it did show that they've mostly use her Britannian name instead of her Japanese name. She has been mostly being called by that in the first season so it would be possible to rename the article --SilentmanX 20:09, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up on the RfD. I agree it deserves to be deleted now; I had a decent ref at one point, but now it just looks like a made-up perjorative. Please do note my comment about potential offensiveness, though. That's how we almost lost Depictions of Muhammad. Bullzeye ^contribs 09:09, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Considering your level of interest in Francis Magalona, I thought I'd call your attention to Wikipedia_talk:Tambayan_Philippines#Letter_of_condolence_to_Pia_Magalona_from_the_Filipino_Wikipedia_community. Regards. -- Alternativity (talk) 09:41, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

		Three Stars and a Sun Commemorative Barnstar
		Aeon17x, I award you this Philippine Barnstar commemorating the passing of Francis Magalona. It is given in recognition of your tireless efforts to improve the Francis Magalona article, and protect it from vandalism, honoring the memory of "the man from Manila." --Alternativity (talk) 19:46, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply] Bless the man if his heart and his land are one...Three stars and a sun! -- Francis Magalona (1964 - 2009)

Whoa, thank you for my first barnstar. I'm more on the maintenance stuff though. But it's still nice to have, I appreciate it. --Aeon17x (talk) 00:13, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

According to

In reviewing the discussion there, I noted this opinion:

The Wiki group of course has every right to define its own policies on the use of government works in its various projects, so its opinion should be the final say. But for clarity, if the use of such government works in Wikipedia were challenged in Philippine courts, the uploader would win hands down. --Anyo Niminus (talk) 16:13, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

In this case, I would suggest that we locate and submit our question to the appropriate Wikipedia group for an interpretation, instead of rushing an opinion via a speedy template. Do you know of an appropriate group? - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 16:43, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

i didnt change the name by my reasoning —Preceding unsigned comment added by Haseo445 (talk • contribs) 17:29, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't want to be so public about it, and announce this in the Tambayan and all, but my reaction to your comment at the Tambayan was as follows:

#. Laugh. hard. very. hard.

#. Stop.

#. Sigh.

#. Slap my forehead with my palm..

#. Sigh again.

hehe. hehe. hehe. hahahahahahahahahahha-- Alternativity (talk) 13:50, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

you got carried away? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.249.176.77 (talk) 18:04, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Er, I'm sorry, but I have no idea who you are or what you're talking about. --Aeon17x (talk) 06:09, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

sorry about my last comment, it was meant for someone else, anyways....how do i make a side article and adding a link to it to a main article?

I'm readding Tubgirl to Shock site, which you removed because rm tubgirl and reference to rotten.com -- not a reliable source for popular Japanese culture.. It shouldn't be taken as Japanese culture as i'm keeping how it was before 64.218.107.168 (likely vandalic) edition. Although I wouldn't mind removing that phrase after the ref. What I don't think we should do is removing it altogether (in fact, there're some questions on the talk about why is it missing). I hope you find it acceptable. Platonides (talk) 21:37, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The point is, tubgirl is relevant, as a "shock meme". The multiple requests for readding just showed that. There're plenty of references to that tubgirl [1]. The problem may be finding references outside blogs and community site. What exactly do you find needs sourcing? Platonides (talk) 20:56, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed you've made edits to University of the Philippines (UP) and UP–related articles and thought you might want to support our recent proposal to create the WikiProject University of the Philippines. We've recently revamped the proposal and started a drive to push the approval of this project. We have a lot of articles that may be under this project and we would like assistance and support for its approval. Hope we'll have a very positive response. Go Fighting Maroons!

P.S. You can look at the preliminary drafts of the project in

I'm sorry if I'm being thick but… the Wikipedia logo is copyrighted therefore I should not include it in the screenshot? Is there copyright infringement if the Wikipedia logo appears… on Wikipedia? I'm not being sarcastic, I swear - I just don't think I get it. MoLo (talk) 06:34, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Forgive my blindness and blabbering stupidity when looking at (and partially driven by) the wrong section. Thanks. -Pecoc (talk) 00:07, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just structured the "linkspam" you removed. I think such a list merits inclusion, but needs cites. Wandalstouring (talk) 14:19, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:47, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Safari 5 on Mac OS X 10.6.png

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:42, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Metapad.png

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:36, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Safari 5 on Mac OS X 10.6.png

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  helpme
  }} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:00, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Safari Reader on Mac OS X 10.6.png

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:20, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Safari 4 on Windows XP.png

Thank you for uploading

image copyright tag

; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

talk) 01:00, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply

]