User talk:AhmetSelim12

Hello, AhmetSelim12, and

• Introduction
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please

• Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia
  – main welcome page.
• Wikipedia:Introduction
  – Wikipedia introduction page.
• Wikipedia:Tutorial
  – Wikipedia editing tutorial.
• Wikipedia:Questions – the "where to ask questions" directory.
• Wikipedia:FAQ – quick answers to the most common questions.
• Wikipedia:New contributors' help page – a place for new users to post questions and get answers by volunteers who monitor or frequent the page.
• Wikipedia:Help desk – where volunteers answer questions on how to use Wikipedia. Many new users go there for help too.
• Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User
  – where a new user can be adopted by an experienced user who will be his/her mentor.
• Help:Wikipedia: The Missing Manual – Thorough and intuitive guide to Wikipedia.

• it did not provide
  independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines
  . Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the publication or company, press releases, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management. Your references were the newspaper itself and cartoons from the newspaper, not independent third-party sources. Neither reference actually supported the text they were referencing either.
• I can't see any verified claim of notability, such as the circulation, number of employees, turnover or profits, in fact there are few real facts at all, it doesn't appear to have headquarters anywhere either.
• it was written in a
  promotional
  tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Your "references" are not, they are spamlinks to the newspaper's website and associated sites. Examples of unsourced or self-sourced claims presented as fact include: It extensively covers domestic [which is where?] and international developments... focus on nations fighting against autocracy... vast network of reporters across the world... Famous cartoonist... goal to support individuals and groups targeted as a result of a rapid global upsurge of populist and autocratic governments... network of experienced reporters around the world — just spam for the paper
• I notice that this is your only article and you said how we can make this right. If you have a
  articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:AhmetSelim12. The template {{Paid
  }} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=AhmetSelim12|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

If you want to reply, you can do so on my talk page. You can alternatively leave a message on this page, and I will know you have done so if you start it with my user name, User:Jimfbleak and sign it with four tildes ~~~~ when you post it. That will send me an alert.

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:05, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published,

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Globe Post and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 06:57, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! AhmetSelim12, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 06:57, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Globe Post, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Globe Post, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

Hello, AhmetSelim12. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Home Lander (talk) 19:18, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]