User talk:Alextwa

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock of 68.160.216.56 lifted or expired. Request handled by: J.delanoygabsadds 14:25, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:71179822105kh.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:05, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Jlsiglertonyawardsa.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:06, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Alextwa, and

to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

]

Hello!

Thanks for uploading some pictures to Wikipedia. I wanted to make sure you were aware of some of the requirements and good practices for uploaded images.

• Pick an image name.

When uploading an image, pick a file name that is descriptive, and unique. Remember that many images may be uploaded about the same topic, and remember that names are case sensitive.

• Source the image.

On the

image description page

, explain where the image came from. If you created the image yourself, then say so. If it's from the web, give a URL. If it's a screenshot of a movie or game, or a scan from a book, give the title.

• Provide copyright and license information.

This part is a little bit trickier, but it's very important. The copyright of the image generally belongs to whomever created it.

If it's a photograph you took, or an image you created (modifying an image that already exists doesn't count) in software like

NoRightsReserved

}}, since there is some dispute as to whether one may grant items into the public domain.

If you didn't create the image, or the copyright somehow belongs to another party (like a screenshot, which you might "create", but the copyright belongs to the author of the movie or video game), then you need to find another

fair use

, but such a use should be justified on the image description page.

• Describe the image.

To another reader, the image may not be immediately understood. A caption in an article doesn't explain the image to a visitor who sees it on its image page. Put a brief explanation of what is in the image on the image description page, similar to what you might include in a caption on an article.

Some links to Wikipedia pages on this subject:

Thanks again for your contributions. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me at my talk page. feydey 02:31, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop uploading multile copies of the same image under diferant names. All of the images that are duplicates of Image:Jlsiglertonyawards.jpg that are not in use in articles has been deleted. If this iameg is needed for an article, and meets the terms of image use, please reupload ONLY ONE copy of the image. Thanks! — xaosflux ^Talk 02:38, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If I may ask, what are you trying to accomplish with this page? Your edits have been reverted by three different editors now as being unconstructive. Adding a tracker to the end of one of the external links doesn't help either.

Also, please don't remove AfD notices from pages. Thanks.

]

STOP SPAMMING

PLEASE stop spamming in the Paris Hilton article. Lil Flip246 15:50, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to

. Please familiarize yourself with the guidelines shown there. All edits that do not follow these guidelines have been changed to match what our MoS recommends. Wikipedia does not require writers to follow all or any of these rules, but their efforts will be more appreciated when they do so.

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you added new information to

]

You are strongly encouraged to consider following the Wikipedia Manual of Style, since many of your edits are departing from the customary guidelines in ways that other editors report as being very disagreeable. Wikipedia does not require writers to follow all or any of these rules, but their efforts will be more appreciated when they do so. Extraordinary Machine 13:35, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1. Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be
   revert
   a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.
2. You're reverting genuinely useful edits, including typo and formatting fixes. Doing so repeatedly is considered
   vandalism, and may lead to you being blocked from editing for a period. Please stop. Extraordinary Machine 14:34, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
   ]

You've reverted on the

WP:AN/3RR. Extraordinary Machine 14:52, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

User notice: temporary 3RR block

hey alextwa --

i've recently made a policy proposal change for 3RR. i noticed you were blocked a short time ago. i'm not sure my suggested changes would have helped in your case, but the idea is spell things out more clearly so people aren't blocked unexpectedly and don't end up bitter about wikipedia.

here are the proposals

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Three-revert_rule#Proposed_policy_changes

comments are welcome.

Justforasecond 16:17, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alextwa, putting incorrect death information on biographies of living persons, not to mention calling the subjects "sluts" and "pieces of shit", as you did on

]

]

Would you please provide the article from forbes.com, where they claimed the Back to Basics Tour grossed over $93 million and is expected to top $100 Million with merchandise and VIP packages included? Because I searched for the article and couldn't not find. Until you find the source, I will revert it back the $43 million Billboard said the tour grossed.ThisIsMyName 09:54, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:0000036091 20061130154852.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:05, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:07, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

]

December 2007

]

]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Gamaliel (Angry Mastodon! Run!) 03:21, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:

I know A NARAS MEMBER! WE ARE DOING IT MY WAY. I KNOW MORE ABOUT THIS THAN YOU DO!

]

AfD nomination of

Max Liron Bratman

What Wikipedia is not

").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at

sign your comments

with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 16:59, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Undo

Hi, ?? -- Harro (talk) 14:05, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keeps Gettin' Better: A Decade of Hits

Is there a reason you continue to remove a sourced professional review from this article? [2] [3] [4] Please also stop re-adding the "TBA" to the "next album" field - there has been no confirmation of any new album in 2009 and this violates

WP:CRYSTAL. - eo (talk) 21:39, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The reason is because it is very short and not considered professional b/c it is not detailed. User:Alextwa

It is not considered professional by whom? You? The Times is reputable and there is no reason to remove it. If the review was equally as short but 4 stars instead of 2 stars, would you remove it? - eo (talk) 21:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is not to the point and detailed. Its as simple as that. I follow music industry and it just is not detailed enough and thats why I keep removing it.

User: Alextwa

What does "following the music industry" have to do with anything? And again, you continue to re-add the "TBD"/"TBA" in the "next album" field. I'm asking you once again to stop this - the review is from a respected newspaper and its length does not make it any less legitimate. - eo (talk) 21:52, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I guess stardards of quality of reviews differs when you compare the US and UK. But it you really want to be technical about it then what I say is true and i'm not trying to be in anyone's face about it. I want the net to be as close to quality as possible. It doesn't make anyone bad or good though. Its just things are different and no one is at fault as a result.

User: Alextwa

January 2009

Lady GaGa, you will be blocked from editing. — Realist² 03:36, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Lady GaGa. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. — Realist² 03:48, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Christina Aguilera, you will be blocked for vandalism. Do not remove talk page comments because you do not like the topic of discussion — Realist² 03:51, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Avril Lavigne, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 18:02, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. A8UDI talk 22:04, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Caps

Just a friendly reminder that the use of ALL CAPS is strongly discouraged, as it may be interpreted as shouting. Thank you :) A8UDI 05:12, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Alextwa. You have new messages at Talk:Avril_Lavigne.
Message added 21:37, 21 January 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 21:37, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. The nominee lists are intended to remain in the article. | Uncle Milty | talk | 15:03, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Please stop deleting the lists of nominees from

Talk:52nd_Grammy_Awards#deleting_nominees is to leave them in the article. If you wish, please discuss the changes you want to make there, before deleting so much content from the article yet again. Thanks much -- Foetusized (talk) 19:45, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Red Hot Chili Peppers

It's true the band won best boxed/limited edition package, but it says the award is in the packaging genre, which has nothing to do with the music performed on the album, just the art design. Many acts win in these kinds of categories, sometimes the award goes directly to band members, but it's usually not counted in the artist's total precisely for comparison purposes. Check List of awards and nominations received by Red Hot Chili Peppers and see only 5 grammies are mentioned; it's the same for most artists. For instance, do check List of awards and nominations received by Radiohead. Just a thought. Purple Colorings (talk) 09:08, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Then those lists should be changed. This page itself for grammy award records includes non-performance awards. Artists are often involved with other aspects other than performance. They should be properly credited on this page. In the GRAMMY Magazine from 2007 it shows a picture of the RHCP with 4 Grammys. --Alextwa (talk) 14:28, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not

autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages

.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious

Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here

.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:43, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed!

I did change the article name, for Latin Grammy Award for Best Female Pop Vocal Album. Jaespinoza (talk) 03:30, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Lana Del Rey

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lana Del Rey. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's

WP:TALKDONTREVERT.--Bettydaisies (talk) 23:46, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

How am I being disruptive? I was adding content. I know the policies of Wikipedia and I have tons of experience even though I have been away for a while. --Alextwa (talk) 23:48, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! You appeared to revert this consensus; I don't know if this was intentional or not, but I do think your other edits were constructive and beneficial to the page. Do let me know if I misunderstood. Have a great day!--Bettydaisies (talk) 23:49, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well I was made a reviewer, so I can review disputes. No need to make accusations of disruptive editing. Do you need me to look at something? Just ask politely. I won’t bite. --Alextwa (talk) 23:51, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I'm sorry if I misunderstood your editing. I appreciate your beneficial and constructive edits to the article, and it was a misinterpretation of your work on my part. There was originally a dispute

WP:COOL before making any assumptions. Thank you for your contributions, have a fantastic week.--Bettydaisies (talk) 23:54, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

--Bettydaisies (talk) 23:54, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Give me time to review it. I can help. Even though I am familiar with folk musicians, my knowledge of Ms. Grant is limited. But I’ll take a look. I can be impartial and it looks like too many users have a vested interest in this dispute. I can be neutral. --Alextwa (talk) 23:57, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, this has been a hot-button issue for many editors given the controversial nature of the subject - thank you for your help.--Bettydaisies (talk) 23:59, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Revoked Reviewer user right, as you obviously have no idea what it is and attempted to use it to assert your authority.

talk) 00:21, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

January 2021

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Bettydaisies (talk) 18:21, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Bettydaisies (talk) 21:48, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sockpuppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:29, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]